green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.1 score
“a defendant has a separate and distinct fifth amendment right against self-incrimination at the punishment phase.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carroll v. State
a defendant has a separate and distinct fifth amendment right against self-incrimination at the punishment phase.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
eljer ii
discussed
Cited "see"
Carroll v. State
See Wilkens v. State, 847 S.W.2d 547, 553 (Tex.Crim.App.1992) (“a defendant has a separate and distinct Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination at the punishment phase”), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1005 , 113 S.Ct. 1646 , 123 L.Ed.2d 268 (1993); Beathard v. State, 767 S.W.2d 423, 431-32 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Brumfield v. State, 445 S.W.2d 732, 734 (Tex.Crim.App.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Wilkens v. State, 847 S.W.2d 547, 550 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1005 , 113 S.Ct. 1646 , 123 L.Ed.2d 268 (1993) (State's introduction of testimony from examining psychiatrists to rebut appellant's presentation of an insanity plea is not errorappellant waives his Fifth Amendment rights when he introduced examination evidence to prove his insanity defense); Draper v. State, 596 S.W.2d 855, 857 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1980) (having opened the door by relating some facts of a transaction, a defendant should not be permitted to assert a Fifth Amendment right to prev…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCaw
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 92-1321.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 1993.
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.