green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.3 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“ ‘[p]risons are dangerous places’ and a certain degree of violent behavior is unavoidable”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Payne v. Collins
risons are dangerous places' and a certain degree of violent behavior is unavoidable
discussed
Cited "see"
Beckett v. Kamaratos
This doctrine provides: “A possessor of land is subject to liability for physical harm to children trespassing thereon caused by an artificial condition upon the land if “(a) the place where the condition exists is one upon which the possessor knows or has reason to know that children are likely to trespass; and “(b) the condition is one which the possessor knows or has reason to know and which he realizes or should realize will involve an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to such children; and “(c) the children because of their youth do not discover the condition or re…
discussed
Cited "see"
Henderson v. AT & T CORP.
See Blumberg v. HCA Management Co., 848 F.2d 642, 644-45 (5th Cir.1988) (“a plaintiff who is aware that she is being replaced in a position she believes she is able to handle by a person outside the protected age group knows enough to support filing a claim”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1007 , 109 S.Ct. 789 , 102 L.Ed.2d 781 (1989); accord Conaway v. Control Data Corp., 955 F.2d 358, 362 (5th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 864 , 113 S.Ct. 186 , 121 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992); Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools Div., 927 F.2d 876 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 868 , 112 S.Ct. 198 , 116 L.Ed.2d 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cox v. Treadway
See Doe v. Sullivan County, Tennessee, 956 F.2d 545, 555 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 864 , 113 S.Ct. 187 , 121 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992) (jury verdict should be set aside when "instructions, viewed as a whole, were confusing, misleading, and prejudicial."). 22 Judge Ryan argues that this suggested Fourth Amendment post-restraint instruction is unconstitutional and eliminates the reasonableness analysis required by Graham.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cox v. Treadway
See Doe v. Sullivan County, Tennessee, 956 F.2d 545, 555 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 864 , 113 S.Ct. 187 , 121 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992) (jury verdict should be set aside when “instructions, viewed as a whole, were confusing, misleading, and prejudicial.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dye v. City of Warren
See also Doe v. Sullivan County, Tennessee, 956 F.2d 545, 552 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 864 , 113 S.Ct. 187 , 121 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992) (ad *1184 dressing whether parties added by an amendment must or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning identity, the action would have been brought against them within the period of limitations).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brodie
To prove conspiracy to violate the TWEA and the CACRs, the government is required to show “specific intent.” See Fuentes-Coba, 738 F.2d at 1196 (prosecution for violating the American Cuban embargo); United States v. Macko, 994 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1993) (same); see also United States v. Tooker, 957 F.2d 1209 (5th Cir.) (prosecution for violating American embargo on trading with Vietnam), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 864 (1992); United States v. Dien Duc Huynh, 246 F.3d 734 (5th Cir. 2001) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stefan E. Brodie
To prove conspiracy to violate the TWEA and the CACRs, the government is required to show “specific intent.” See Fuentes-Coba, 738 F.2d at 1196 (prosecution for violating the American Cuban embargo); United States v. Macko, 994 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir.1993) (same); see also United States v. Tooker, 957 F.2d 1209 (5th Cir.) (prosecution for violating American embargo on trading with Vietnam), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 864 , 113 S.Ct. 187 , 121 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992); United States v. Dien Duc Huynh, 246 F.3d 734 (5th Cir.2001) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Price v. Guy
(2×)
See, e.g., Carter v. United States Steel Corporation, 529 Pa. 409, 420 , 604 A.2d 1010, 1016 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 864 , 113 S.Ct. 186 , 121 L.Ed.2d 130 (1992) (burden to show prejudice in order to grant new trial on moving party).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Rowan Companies, Inc.
“If the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of the moving party ... that reasonable jurors could not have arrived at a contrary verdict, then (the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit) will conclude that the motion should have been granted.” Burch v. Coca-Cola Company, 119 F.3d 305, 313 (5th Cir.1997), citing RTC v. Cramer, 6 F.3d 1102 , 1109 (5th Cir.1993); see also Crist v. Dickson Welding, Inc., 957 F.2d 1281, 1285 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 864 , 113 S.Ct. 187 , 121 L.Ed.2d 132 (1992), citing Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365, 374 (5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daye v. General Motors Corp.
Thus, federal appellate courts have characterized their review of the grant of a motion for JNOV as "de novo" in that the appellate courts again "must view all the facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom the verdict was directed." Thomas v. Stalter, 20 F.3d 298, 301 (7th Cir.1994); see also Crist v. Dickson Welding, Inc., 957 F.2d 1281 (5th Cir.1992), rehearing denied, cert. denied, Dickson Welding, Inc. v. Alexander & Alexander, Inc., 506 U.S. 864 , 113 S.Ct. 187 , 121 L.Ed.2d 132 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Force v. City of Memphis
See also Doe v. Sullivan County, Tennessee, 956 F.2d 545, 552 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 864 (1992) (the issue is whether parties added by an amendment must or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning identity, the action would have been brought against them within the period of limitations). 20 Other courts of appeals also limit relation back where a new party is added by an amended pleading to instances of mistake or misnomer.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Persyn v. United States
See, e.g., Lubrizol v. Exxon Corp., 957 F.2d 1302 , 1309 n. 15 (5th Cir.) (Garza, J., dissenting) (noting that the Lubrizol court ignored the Johnson factors which were employed by the Fifth Circuit in a previous ease), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 864 , 113 S.Ct. 186 , 121 L.Ed.2d 131 (1992); Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir.1974) (adopting a twelve-point test for reasonableness of attorney’s fees); ADO Finance, AG v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 938 F.Supp. 590, 595 (C.D.Cal.1996) (applying the twelve Johnson factors).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frontier Pilots Litigation Steering Committee, Inc.
v.
Continental Airlines, Inc.
v.
Continental Airlines, Inc.
No. 92-63.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
506 U.S. 864
C. A. 3d- Cir. Certiorari denied.