green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.3 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 2 distinct cases ·
“Yellow Freight ”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
A. Terzi Productions, Inc. v. Theatrical Protective Union
where federal laws and policies other than the nlra are implicated, the garmon rule is frequently considered inapplicable
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
yellow freight
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Charles M. Carberry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Ron Carey & William Hamilton
See United States v. IBT (“Yellow Freight”), 948 F.2d 98, 103 (2d Cir.1991), vacated as moot, 506 U.S. 802 , 113 S.Ct. 31 , 121 L.Ed.2d 4 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Riso
See In re Coones, 954 F.2d 596 (10th Cir.1992), reh’g denied (Feb. 14, 1992), cert. granted and judgment vacated — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 31 , 121 L.Ed.2d 4 (1992), motion for clarification denied — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 402 , 121 L.Ed.2d 328 (1992), on remand 996 F.2d 250 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 684 , 126 L.Ed.2d 651 (1994); In re Peterson, 920 F.2d 1389, 1393-1394 , 122 B.R. [20] (8th Cir.1990); Matter of Sherk, 918 F.2d 1170, 1174 , 121 B.R. [46] (5th Cir.1990); and In re Dembs, 757 F.2d 777 , 780, 48 B.R. [14] (6th Cir.1985); but see Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz, 938 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Coones v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
(2×)
See In re Coones, 954 F.2d 596 (10th Cir.), cert. granted & judgment vacated ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 31 , 121 L.Ed.2d 4 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conrow v. City of Torrance (In re Park Beyond the Park)
Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 239 U.S. 441 , 36 S.Ct. 141 , 60 L.Ed. 372 (1915)); see also Sierra Lake Reserve v. City of Rocklin, 938 F.2d 951, 957 (9th Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 31 , 121 L.Ed.2d 4 (1992) (citing Yee v. City of Escondido, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1522 , 118 L.Ed.2d 153 (1992) (due process is satisfied when legislative acts are performed in the normal manner prescribed by law).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Albert COONES
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
No. 91-1793.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
113 S. Ct. 31
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz, 503 U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1644, 118 L.Ed.2d 280 (1992).