green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Nunez
(2×)
See Bradford v. Crozier (In re Laymon), 958 F.2d 72, 75 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied 506 U.S. 917 , 113 S.Ct. 328 , 121 L.Ed.2d 247 (1992); In re Terry Ltd.
cited
Cited "see"
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. v. Torchmark Corp.
See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Liberty Group, 965 F.2d 879 , 885-86 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 918 , 113 S.Ct. 329 , 121 L.Ed.2d 247 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gottstein v. National Ass'n for the Self Employed
(2×)
See Board of County Comm’rs v. Liberty Group, 965 F.2d 879 , 885-86 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 918 , 113 S.Ct. 329 , 121 L.Ed.2d 247 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
DeFelice v. Johnson
(2×)
See O’Quinn v. Wedco Technology, Inc., 752 F.Supp. 984 (D.Colo.1990), aff'd, 955 F.2d 49 (10th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 917 , 113 S.Ct. 328 , 121 L.Ed.2d 247 (1992) (concluding that the Colorado Supreme Court would follow Schiavone if now presented with the relation-back issue).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Johnson
(2×)
See Bradford v. Crozier (In re Laymon), 958 F.2d 72, 75 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 328 , 121 L.Ed.2d 247 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Riverwoods Chappaqua Corp. And Harvey Shapiro v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.
See Brittingham v. Mobil Corp., 943 F.2d 297, 301 (3d Cir.1991); accord Board of County Comm’rs v. Liberty Group, 965 F.2d 879 , 885 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 329 , 121 L.Ed.2d 247 (1992); Odishelidze v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co., 853 F.2d 21, 23-24 (1st Cir.1988) (per curiam); Entre Computer Ctrs., Inc. v. FMG, Inc., 819 F.2d 1279 , 1287 (4th Cir.1987); Official Publications, Inc. v. Kable News Co., 775 F.Supp. 631, 636 (S.D.N.Y.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
General Electric Capital Corp. v. Future Media Productions Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Laymon, 958 F.2d 72, 75 (5th Cir.1992) (holding “that when an oversecured creditor’s claim arises from a contract, the contract provides the rate of post-petition interest,” subject to examination of “the equities involved in [the] bankruptcy proceeding”), cert. den., 506 U.S. 917 , 113 S.Ct. 328 , 121 L.Ed.2d 247 (1992); In re Terry Ltd.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
General Electric Capital Corp. v. Future Media Productions Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Laymon, 958 F.2d 72, 75 (5th Cir.1992) (holding “that when an oversecured creditor’s claim arises from a contract, the contract provides the rate of post-petition interest,” subject to examination of “the equities involved in [the] bankruptcy proceeding”), cert. denied 506 U.S. 917 , 113 S.Ct. 328 , 121 L.Ed.2d 247 (1992); In re Terry Ltd.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James E. CROZIER, Chapter 11 Trustee
v.
Theron BRADFORD, Trustee
v.
Theron BRADFORD, Trustee
No. 92-312.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1992.
Cited by 33 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Denied.