green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
14.3 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"GSOB/GYN"
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Guam Society Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists v. Ada
gsob/gyn
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Doe v. State
Instead, "[t]he practical effect of holding a statute unconstitutional 'as applied' is to prevent its future application in a similar context, but not to render it utterly inoperative." Ada, 506 U.S. at 1011.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Canton v. Koury, Unpublished Decision (6-20-2005)
In an as-applied challenge, "the plaintiff contends that application of the statute in the particular context in which he has acted, or in which he proposes to act, would be unconstitutional." Ada v. Guam Soc'y of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011, 1012, 113 S.Ct. 633, 634 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992) (Scalia, J., dissenting), denying cert. to 962 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1992).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Hsu
Courts “have applied to statutes restricting speech a so-called ‘overbreadth’ doctrine, rendering such a statute invalid in all its applications (i.e., facially invalid) if it is invalid in any of them.” (Ada, Governor of Guam v. Guam Society of Obstetricians & Gynecologists et al. (1992) 506 U.S. 1011, 1012 [ 113 S.Ct. 633, 634 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 ] (dis. opn. of Scalia, J. to order denying cert.); see also Gooding v. Wilson (1971) 405 U.S. 518, 520-521 [ 92 S.Ct. 1103, 1105-1106 , 31 L.Ed.2d 408 ] [exception applies to claim of vagueness]; People v. Rodriguez (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 157,…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Rodriguez
More recently, the general rule was elaborated in Ada v. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1992) 506 U.S. 1011, 1012 [ 113 S.Ct. 633, 634 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 ] (Ada) (Justice Scalia, with Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice White concurring, dissenting from a denial of certiorari) as follows: “The practical effect of holding a statute unconstitutional ‘as applied’ is to prevent its future application in a similar context, but not to render it utterly inoperative.
cited
Cited "see"
Bobby Kitcheon And Candance Ream, V. City Of Seattle
See In re Det. of Turay, 139 Wn.2d 379 , 417 n.27, 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (citing Ada v. Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1012, 113 S. Ct. 633 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Jenkins
Moreover, in the case of willful homicide, "a spontaneous and not concerted or planned use of [a] weapon to kill is not, without more, attributable to the companion whose guilt in a joint design to effect death must be established beyond a reasonable doubt" ( People v Monaco , 14 NY2d 43, 45 [1964]; [*2] accord People v Rivera , 176 AD2d 510, 512 [1st Dept 1991], lv denied 79 NY2d 863 [1992]; see People v Cabassa , 79 NY2d 722, 728 [1992], cert denied 506 US 1011 [1992]).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wheatley
Partnership , 123 Ohio St.3d 278 , 2009-Ohio-5030 , 915 N.E.2d 1205 , ¶ 13 ("for a statute to be facially unconstitutional, it must be unconstitutional in all applications"); Harrold at ¶ 37 ; accord United States v. Salerno , 481 U.S. 739 , 745, 107 S.Ct. 2095 , 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987) (explaining that law facially unconstitutional if "no set of circumstances exists under which the [law] would be valid"). "[A] facial challenge permits a statute to be attacked for its effect on conduct other than the conduct for which the defendant is charged." State v. White , 2013-Ohio-51 , 988 N.E.2d 595 (6…
discussed
Cited "see"
Gessler v. Colorado Common Cause
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Ada v. Guam Soc. of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 633, 633 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992) (Scalia, J., dissenting from the denial of the petition for certiora-vi) ("'The practical effect of holding a statute unconstitutional 'as applied is to prevent its future application in a similar context." (emphasis added)). 1 21 I agree with the court of appeals that Rule 4.1 goes beyond what was compelled by Sampson in two limited respects.
discussed
Cited "see"
Esso Virgin Islands, Inc. v. Government of the United States ex rel. Virgin Islands Department of Licensing & Consumer Affairs
See Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians & Gynecologists v. Ada, No. 90-16706, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13490 , at *14 (9th Cir. June 16, 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992); see also Carlos v. Guam, Nos. 95-17356, 96-15419, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 17187 , at *8 (9th Cir. July 7, 1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Mony Life Insurance v. Ericson
See Ada v. Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 633 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (Mem.) (Sca-lia, J., dissenting from denial of petition for writ of certiorari).
cited
Cited "see"
VFW John O'Connor Post 4833 v. Santa Rosa County
See Ada v. Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1012, 113 S.Ct. 633, 634 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992) (Scalia, J., dissenting); see also Horton v. City of St.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael R. Burns
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael R. Burns
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Lee Russell
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 771 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Lee Russell
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 771 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelvin Knight
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 775-76 (8th Cir.1992), cert, denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelvin Knight
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 775-76 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Don Lamar Love, Also Known as Pink, United States of America v. Dewayne D. Phillips, Also Known as Boss
(2×)
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 767 (8th Cir.) (noting that 97% of defendants prosecuted for crack offenses in the Western District of Missouri from 1988-1989 were African- American), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tunstall v. Bergeson
(2×)
See JJR Inc. v. City of Seattle, 126 Wn.2d 1, 3-4 , 891 P.2d 720 (1995). “ ‘[A] facial challenge must be rejected unless there exists no set of circumstances in which the statute can constitutionally be applied.’ ” In re Detention of Turay, 139 Wn.2d 379 , 417 n.27, 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (quoting with approval Ada v. Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1012, 113 S. Ct. 633 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tunstall Ex Rel. Tunstall v. Bergeson
(2×)
See JJR Inc. v. City of Seattle, 126 Wash.2d 1, 3-4 , 891 P.2d 720 (1995). "`[A] facial challenge must be rejected unless there exists no set of circumstances in which the statute can constitutionally *702 be applied.'" In re Detention of Turay, 139 Wash.2d 379 , 417 n. 27, 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (quoting with approval Ada v. Guam Soc'y of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1012, 113 S.Ct. 633 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992) (Scalia, J. dissenting)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Don Lamar Love
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 767 (8th Cir.) (noting that 97% of defendants prosecuted for crack offenses in the Western District of Missouri from 1988-1989 were African- American), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Gilmore
See Ada v. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 633 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992) (Scalia, J., dissenting from denial of petition for writ of certiorari) (citing Roe, 410 U.S. at 164 , 93 S.Ct. 705 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Franklin Einfeldt
See United States v. Swinney, 970 F.2d 494, 498 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992); United States v. Nivica, 887 F.2d 1110, 1121 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1005 , 110 S.Ct. 1300 , 108 L.Ed.2d 477 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cooke
United States v. Miele, 989 F.2d 659, 667-668 (3rd Cir. 1993); see United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 776 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stone
(2×)
See United States v. Gates, 967 F.2d 497, 501 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stone
See United States v. Gates, 967 F.2d 497, 501 (11th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael F. Einfeldt
See United States v. Swinney, 970 F.2d 494 , 498 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992); United States v. Nivica, 887 F.2d 1110, 1121 (1st Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1005 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frost
See Ada v. Guam Soc'y of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1012, 113 S.Ct. 633, 634 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992)(Scalia, J., dissenting), denying cert. to 962 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir.1992); see also Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 494-95, 497 , 102 S.Ct. 1186, 1191-92 , 71 L.Ed.2d 362 (1982)(assuming that statute does not reach constitutionally protected conduct, facial vagueness challenge will fail unless statute "is impermissibly vague in all of its applications"). 107 Congo asserts that the phrase "scheme to defraud" in § 1341 is meaningless and rend…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frost
See Ada v. Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1012, 113 S.Ct. 633, 634 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992)(Scalia, J., dissenting), denying cert. to 962 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir.1992); see also Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 494-95, 497 , 102 S.Ct. 1186, 1191-92 , 71 L.Ed.2d 362 (1982)(assuming that statute does not reach constitutionally protected conduct, facial vagueness challenge will fail unless statute “is impermissibly vague in all of its applications”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sergio Javier Granados
See United States v. Swinney, 970 F.2d 494 , 497 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992); United States v. Kiser, 948 F.2d 418, 425 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 983 , 112 S.Ct. 1666 , 118 L.Ed.2d 387 (1992); United States v. Delgado, 914 F.2d 1062, 1065-66 (8th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sergio J. Granados
See United States v. Swinney, 970 F.2d 494 , 497 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992); United States v. Kiser, 948 F.2d 418, 425 (8th Cir. -3- 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 983 (1992); United States v. Delgado, 914 F.2d 1062, 1065-66 (8th Cir. 1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tony J. Byler
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 771 (8th Cir.) ("[Alt the sentencing phase, ... the government must generally satisfy a preponderance of the evidence standard."), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tony J. Byler
See United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 771 (8th Cir.) ("[A]t the sentencing phase, . . . the government must generally satisfy a preponderance of the evidence standard."), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Iowa v. Patrick Edouard
(2×)
Ed. 2d at 183 ; see also Ada v. 74 __________________________ Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1011, 113 S. Ct. 633, 634 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Amended December 3, 2014 State of Iowa v. Patrick Edouard
Ed. 2d at 183 ; see also Ada v. Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1011, 113 S. Ct. 633, 634 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re A.Z.
See, e.g., United States v. Eichman (1990), 496 U.S. 310, 312 [.] In an as-applied challenge, the challenger ‘contends that application of the statute in the particular context in which he has acted, or in which he proposes to act, [is] unconstitutional.’ Ada v. Guam Soc. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (1992), 506 U.S. 1011 [,] (Scalia, J., dissenting).” State v. Lowe, 112 Meigs App. No. 11CA3 5 Ohio St.3d 507 , 2007-Ohio-606 , at ¶17.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Advantage Media, LLC v. City of Eden Prairie
Such a showing is required because the overbreadth doctrine is not recognized “outside the limited context of the First Amendment.” United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 , 107 S.Ct. 2095 , 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987) (citing Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253 , 269 n. 18, 104 S.Ct. 2403 , 81 L.Ed.2d 207 (1984)); see also Ada v. Guam Soc. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1012, 113 S.Ct. 633 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992) (over-breadth doctrine may apply only upon facial First Amendment free-speech grounds).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ochoa
City of Fargo v. Rockwell, 1999 ND 125, ¶ 18 , 597 N.W.2d 406 (citing McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168, 183 , 104 S.Ct. 944 , 79 L.Ed.2d 122 (1984), rehearing denied, 465 U.S. 1112 , 104 S.Ct. 1620 , 80 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984)); see also United States v. Swinney, 970 F.2d 494, 498 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1007 , 113 S.Ct. 1650 , 123 L.Ed.2d 271 (1993) (holding, “[t]he defendant ... does not have a constitutional right to hybrid representation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rhode Island Medical Society v. Whitehouse
Compare Fargo Women’s Health Org. v. Schafer, 507 U.S. 1013 , 1014, 113 S.Ct. 1668 , 123 L.Ed.2d 285 (1993) (O’Connor, J., concurring) (Casey analysis controls) luith Ada v. Guam Soc’y of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 506 U.S. 1011 , 1011-13, 113 S.Ct. 633 , 121 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (Salerno analysis controls).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re T.L.L.
See also Martin v. United States, 567 A.2d 896 , 902 n. 16 (D.C. 1989), appeal after remand, 605 A.2d 934 (D.C.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brent Allery
See, e.g., United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992); cf. Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193, 202-03 (1992) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brent William Allery
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992); cf. Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193, 202-03 , 112 S.Ct. 1112 , 117 L.Ed.2d 341 (1992). 10 The other considerations to which the trial court adverted in deciding to depart were that Mr. Allery had no prior criminal history, that he refrained from criminal behavior after his trial, and that his actions represented aberrant behavior on his part.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Matthews
See also United States v. Gates, 967 F.2d 497 (11th Cir. 1992) cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Matthews
See also United States v. Gates, 967 F.2d 497 (11th Cir.1992) cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Concrete Holding Co. v. James P. Davis
See Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 397 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 (1990); see also United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir.) ("As a general rule, an appellate court may review only the issues specifically raised and argued in an appellant's brief."), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Concrete Holding Co.
See Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 397 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 , 111 S.Ct. 233 , 112 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990); see also United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir.) (“As a general rule, an appellate court may review only the issues specifically raised and argued in an appellant’s brief.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Corporation v. Concrete Holding Company, Formerly Known as St. Charles Quarry Company, Doing Business as Defiance Quarry, Doing Business as Kurtz Concrete, Inc., Doing Business as Goellner Redi-Mix, Inc., a Corporation St. Charles County Sanitary Landfill, Inc., an Administratively-Dissolved Corporation Quarry Holding Company, a Voluntarily-Dissolved Corporation v. John J. Barnes, Jr. Quarry Holding Company, Third Party John J. Barnes, Jr. Quarry Holding Company James P. Davis Quarry Development Company Community Title Company, Cross Concrete Holding Company, Third Party v. James P. Davis, Individually, and as Statutory and Common Law Trustee for Quarry Holding Company Quarry Development Company Community Title Company, Third Party
See Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 397 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 , 111 S.Ct. 233 , 112 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990); see also United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir.) ("As a general rule, an appellate court may review only the issues specifically raised and argued in an appellant's brief."), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kevin Jacobs, AKA Maurice Hawkins
See also United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 770 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hollingsworth
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-6380.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 30, 1992.
506 U.S. 1011
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.