Fund for Accurate & Informed Representation, Inc. v. Weprin, 506 U.S. 1017 (1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Fund for Accurate & Informed Representation, Inc. v. Weprin, 506 U.S. 1017 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2003 · …absent credible evidence that the maximum deviation exceeded 10 percent , plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination ... sufficient to warrant further analysis by this court. ⚠ not in text
32 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cecere v. County of Nassau (nyed, 2003-07-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Cecere v. County of Nassau (2×)
E.D.N.Y · 2003 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
absent credible evidence that the maximum deviation exceeded 10 percent , plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination ... sufficient to warrant further analysis by this court.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Lorenzo Jesus Mejia-Alarcon
10th Cir. · 1993 · confidence medium
S. Ct. 1147, 121 L.Ed.2d 577 (1992); Coursey v. Broadhurst, 888 F.2d 338, 342 (5th Cir. 1989) (holding that cattle theft is not a crime of dishonesty); United States v. Newman, 849 F.2d 156, 163 (5th Cir.1988) (implying that theft and felony theft are not included in Rule 609(a)(2), but holding that theft-forgery and theft by deception are included); United States v. Mehrmanesh, 689 F.2d .822, 833 (9th Cir. 1982) (holding that a drug smuggling conviction is not per se a crime of dishonesty); Millings, 535 F.2d at 123 (holding that convictions for possession of narcotics and carrying a gun with…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n (2×)
SCOTUS · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Fund for Accurate and Informed Representation, Inc. v. Weprin, 506 U.S. 1017 , 113 S.Ct. 650 , 121 L.Ed.2d 577 (1992) (summarily affirming a District Court's finding that there was no prima facie case where the maximum population deviation was 9.43%).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fund for Accurate and Informed Representation, Inc.
v.
Weprin
No. 92-586.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1992.
506 U.S. 1017
Jurisdiction, Set, Would.
Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: E.D. New York (2)

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. N. Y.

Justice Stevens would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.