green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Analysis”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Diamond Hotel Co. v. Matsunaga
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
analysis
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Joseph F. Purcell, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
See Honey v. United States, 963 F.2d 1083, 1090 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 413 S: Ct. 676, 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992). *939 Others have defined the term more broadly to encompass not only legal obligations per se, but also “restrictions imposed by a creditor” — restrictions that, while perhaps not legally enforceable, may be practically irresistible because they arise out of the disparity of bargaining power as between the taxpayer and its source of financing.
examined
Cited "see"
In re Cherne
(3×)
See Honey[, 963 F.2d at 1090 ], cert denied, 506 U.S. 1028 , 113 S.Ct. 676 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992) ... others have defined the term more broadly to encompass not only legal obligations per se, but also “restrictions imposed by a creditor” — restrictions that, while perhaps not legally enforceable, may be practically irresistible because they arise out of the disparity of bargaining power as between the taxpayer and its source of financing.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pauly v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
See Wabol v. Villacrusis, 958 F.2d 1450, 1453 (9th Cir.) (amending 898 F.2d 1381 (9th Cir.1990)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1027 , 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992) (quoting American Export Lines, Inc. v. Alvez, 446 U.S. 274, 277 , 100 S.Ct. 1673 , 64 L.Ed.2d 284 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph E. Pauly, Husband Judy B. Pauly, Wife v. U.S. Department of Agriculture Ann M. Veneman, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture National Appeals Division of the United States Department of Agriculture Norman G. Cooper, Director of the National Appeals Division of the United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture James R. Little, Acting Administrator of the Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Joseph E. Pauly, Husband Judy B. Pauly, Wife v. U.S. Department of Agriculture Ann M. Veneman, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture National Appeals Division of the United States Department of Agriculture Norman G. Cooper, Director of the National Appeals Division of the United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture James R. Little, Acting Administrator of the Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture
See Wabol v. Villacrusis, 958 F.2d 1450, 1453 (9th Cir.) (amending 898 F.2d 1381 (9th Cir.1990)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1027 , 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992) (quoting American Export Lines, Inc. v. Alvez, 446 U.S. 274, 277 , 100 S.Ct. 1673 , 64 L.Ed.2d 284 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferrante v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
See Moreland v. United States, 968 F.2d 655, 657-60 (8th Cir.) (en bane), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1028 , 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992); United States v. Woods, 888 F.2d 653, 655-56 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1006 , 110 S.Ct. 1301 , 108 L.Ed.2d 478 (1990); Dawson v. Scott, 50 F.3d 884, 888-91 (11th Cir.1995); see also United States v. Zackular, 945 F.2d 423, 425 (1st Cir.1991) (time spent in home confinement prior to sentencing); United States v. Edwards, 960 F.2d 278, 282-83 (2d Cir.1992) (time spent in home confinement under electronic monitoring while released on bond); …
discussed
Cited "see"
DIAMOND HOTEL CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elizabeth Blanco MATSUNAGA, Defendant-Appellant
See Wabol v. Villacrusis, 958 F.2d 1450, 1462 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1027 , 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992), (holding that Article XII of the Commonwealth Constitution does not violate the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution).
cited
Cited "see"
Sablan v. Tenorio
See Wabol v. Villacrusis, 958 F.2d 1450, 1458-59 (9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Philippine Goods, Inc. v. Wabol, 506 U.S. 1027 , 113 S. Ct. 675 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph Hosna v. Michael Groose
See Moreland v. United States, 968 F.2d 655, 660 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1028 , 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph Frank Hosna v. Michael Groose David Dormire Jon W. Kirk Daniel Kempker Robert Acree, Kelly Neal v. Michael Groose Gerald Bommell Jack Kirk, Max D. Miller v. Michael Groose David Dormire Dick Moore Steve Long Gerald Bommell Jack Kirk, Joseph Frank Hosna v. Michael Groose David Dormire Jon W. Kirk Daniel Kempker Robert Acree, Donald E. Miller v. Michael Groose Jon W. Kirk David Dormire Gerald Bommell Daniel Kempker Betty Jaeger John Doe Robert Faith James Eberle, Kelly Neal v. Mike Groose Gerald Bommell Jack Kirk, Max D. Miller v. Michael Groose David Dormire Dick Moore Steve Long Gerald Bommell Jack Kirk, Donald E. Miller v. Michael Groose Jon W. Kirk David Dormire Gerald Bommell Daniel Kempker Betty Jaeger, John Doe, Robert Faith, James Eberle, Robert Don Arnold v. Dick Moore Gail Hughes Steve Long Michael Groose, Robert Don Arnold v. Dick Moore Gail Hughes Steve Long Michael Groose
See Moreland v. United States, 968 F.2d 655, 660 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1028 , 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chad Allen Beers
See Moreland v. United States, 968 F.2d 655 , 657 n. 6 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1028 , 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harish K. Bharti and Anoop Bharti, Husband and Wife v. King County Bruce Knutson Jane Doe Knutson Pat Nixon Gary Tomlinson
See Robinson v. City of Seattle, 830 P.2d 318, 345 (Wash.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 676 (1992). ("The elements to be proved are: first, an admission, statement, or act inconsistent with a claim afterwards asserted; second, action by another in reasonable reliance on that act, statement, or admission; and third, injury to the party who relied if the court allows the first party to contradict or repudiate the prior act, statement, or admission.").
discussed
Cited "see"
Service Employees International Union, Local 102 Probation Officers Association Roslinda Arellanes Teresa Ayala Renee U. Bonner v. County of San Diego
Id. at 1480 (quoting Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463 , 477 n. 30, 98 S.Ct. 2454 , 2462 n. 30, 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978)); accord Wabol v. Villacrusis, 958 F.2d 1450, 1454 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brutsche v. City of Kent
See Robinson, 119 Wn.2d at 60-61 (in alleging that the City of Seattle acted arbitrarily and capriciously in continuing to enforce a previously invalidated housing preservation ordinance, the plaintiffs stated a claim for relief under section 1983). 2 To state a cause of action under section 1983, a plaintiff must allege that (1) the defendant acted under color of state law, and (2) the defendant’s conduct deprived him of rights protected by the constitution or laws of the United States. 3 Sintra, Inc. v. Seattle, 119 Wn.2d 1, 11-12 , 829 P.2d 765 , cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 676 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Mark Davis, A/K/A Ref
See United States v. Ashers, 968 F.2d 411, 414-15 (4th Cir.) (adjustment proper if supported by any ground), cert. denied, 61 U.S.L.W. 3419 (U.S.1992). 7 We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court.
examined
Cited "see"
John F. Dawson v. Roger Scott, Warden
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Our first inquiry, therefore, is to determine whether pretrial, presentence defendants and postsentence convicts are similarly situated. 20 Even if pretrial, presentence defendants and postsentence convicts are treated equally 21 while residing in a halfway house, “as a matter of law ... their divergent legal status negates the possibility that they are similarly situated.” Id.; accord Moreland v. United States, 968 F.2d 655, 660-61 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guimont v. City of Seattle
See Robinson v. Seattle, 119 Wn.2d 34 , 830 P.2d 318 (holding that the City’s enforcement of a previously invalidated housing preservation ordinance gave rise to a civil rights claim), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 676 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Service Employees International Union, Local 102 Probation Officers Association Roslinda Arellanes Teresa Ayala Renee U. Bonner v. County of San Diego
Id. at 1480 (quoting Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463 , 477 n. 30, 98 S.Ct. 2454 , 2462 n. 30, 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978)); accord Wabol v. Villacrusis, 958 F.2d 1450, 1454 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Trevino
See United States v. Ashers, 968 F.2d 411, 414 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 61 U.S.L.W. 3419 (U.S.1992). 9 We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert H. Demaio
(2×)
See generally Moreland v. United States, 968 F.2d 655, 662-63 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (Loken, J., concurring), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992); see also Koray v. Sizer, 21 F.3d 558, 561-66 (3d Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David I. Wynne
See United States v. Ashers, 968 F.2d 411, 414 (4th Cir.) (adjustment is mandatory if any factor validly supports it), cert. denied, 61 U.S.L.W. 3419 (U.S. 1992). 9 We therefore vacate the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dutton v. WASH. PHYSICIANS HEALTH PROG.
(2×)
See also Black's Law Dictionary 693 (6th ed. 1990) ("In common usage this term is ordinarily used to describe that state of mind denoting honesty of purpose, freedom from intention to defraud, and, generally speaking, means being faithful to one's duty or obligation."). [10] 40 Wash.App. 854, 862-63 , 701 P.2d 529 (1985) (also affirming summary judgment where good faith was at issue), review denied, 104 Wash.2d 1014 (1995). [11] 119 Wash.2d 34, 65 , 830 P.2d 318 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1028 , 113 S.Ct. 676 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sintra, Inc. v. City of Seattle
(2×)
See also Robinson v. City of Seattle, 119 Wash.2d 34, 52-53 , 830 P.2d 318 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1028 , 113 S.Ct. 676 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992); San Telmo Assocs. v. City of Seattle, 108 Wash.2d 20, 24-25 , 735 P.2d 673 (1987). [6] A fourth element of Justice Talmadge's new test asks whether damages were proximately caused by the regulation.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
County of Adams v. Hibbard
(4×)
See, e.g., Robinson v. City of Seattle, 119 Wash.2d 34 , 830 P.2d 318 cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1028 , 113 S.Ct. 676 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Enrique Agulto SANTOS; And Ignacia A. Santos, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NANSAY MICRONESIA, INC., Defendant-Appellant
See also Wabol v. Villacrusis, 958 F.2d 1450 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1027 , 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992); Ferreira v. Borja, 1 F.3d 960 (9th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garneau v. City of Seattle
(2×)
See e.g., Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm Desert, 998 F.2d at 690 (“the stated purposes of the [mobile home rent control] ordinance were to alleviate hardship created by rapidly escalating rents; ... and to protect residents from unconscionable and coercive changes in rental rates ... [T]he Supreme Court has held that these goals are legitimate.”) (citing Pennell v. City of San Jose, 485 U.S. 1, 13-14 , 108 S.Ct. 849, 858-59 , 99 L.Ed.2d 1 (1988)); see also Robinson v. Seattle, 119 Wash.2d 34, 53, 54 , 830 P.2d 318 (1992), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 676 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES v. McCOMBS
(2×)
Hochstein, 900 F.2d at 546 ; see also Honey v. United States, 963 F.2d 1083, 1087 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 676 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992); Ruth, 823 F.2d at 1093 ; Calderone v. United States, 799 F.2d 254, 258 (6th Cir.1986); Psaty, 442 F.2d at 1160 . 30 In United States v. Lease, 346 F.2d 696, 701 (2d Cir.1965), we set forth the manner by which the presumption operates: 31 [O]verall, the Government has the burden of coming forward and persuading the trier that the taxpayer has or had a tax liability.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McCombs
(2×)
Hochstein, 900 F.2d at 546 ; see also Honey v. United States, 963 F.2d 1083, 1087 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 676 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992); Ruth, 823 F.2d at 1093 ; Calderone v. United States, 799 F.2d 254, 258 (6th Cir.1986); Psaty, 442 F.2d at 1160 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ziya K. Koray v. Frank Sizer United States Bureau of Prisons Attorney General of the United States
See, e.g., Moreland v. United States, 968 F.2d 655, 659-60 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (plurality) (with one judge concurring in judgment and five judges dissenting), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992); United States v. Becak, 954 F.2d 386, 387-88 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2286 , 119 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992); Spinola v. United States, 941 F.2d 1528, 1529 (11th Cir.1991); Randall v. Whelan, 938 F.2d 522, 525 (4th Cir.1991) (with Butzner, J., dissenting); United States v. Insley, 927 F.2d 185, 186 (4th Cir.1991); United States v. Woods, 888 F.2d 653, 655-56…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schmanke v. United States Bureau of Prisons
See, e.g., Moreland v. United States, 968 F.2d 655, 659 (8th Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 675 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyd L. Cline, and Counterclaim v. United States of America, and Counterclaim
(2×)
See e.g., Honey v. United States, 963 F.2d 1083 (8th Cir.) (vice-president, secretary and treasurer either acting with another officer paid creditors or at least knew the other officer alone was paying creditors), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 676 , 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992); Denbo v. United States, 988 F.2d 1029 (10th Cir.1993) (director and secretary/treasurer with signatory authority knew of unpaid taxes and met regularly with other officers to discuss financial problems).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Margola Associates v. City of Seattle
(2×)
See also Sintra, Inc. v. Seattle, 119 Wn.2d 1 , 829 P.2d 765 , cert. denied, 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992); Robinson v. Seattle, 119 Wn.2d 34 , 830 P.2d 318 , cert. denied, 121 L.Ed.2d 598 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ERWIN & ERWIN
v.
Suzan BREWER
v.
Suzan BREWER
No. 92-668.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1992.
Cited by 120 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Sup. Ct. of the Comm. of the N… (1)
The motion of petitioner to strike is denied. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.