Marshall v. Nelson Elec., 510 U.S. 1092 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Marshall v. Nelson Elec., 510 U.S. 1092 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“iron ore”
41 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Midland Export, Ltd. v. Elkem Holding, Inc. (paed, 1996-11-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Midland Export, Ltd. v. Elkem Holding, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1996 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
iron ore
cited Cited "see" Mallo v. Public Health Trust of Dade County
S.D. Fla. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Evanston Hosp. v. Hauck, 1 F.3d 540 , 541-44 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1091 , 114 S.Ct. 921 , 127 L.Ed.2d 215 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Ramirez v. IBP, Inc.
D. Kan. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lower Lake Erie Iron Ore Antitrust Litigation, 998 F.2d 1144 , 1177-78 (3rd Cir.1993) (post-judgment interest runs from court ordered judgment on jury’s verdict and not from later final judgment entered after post-trial motions) (“The statute [ 28 U.S.C. § 1961 ] does not, by its terms, mandate that the judgment from which interest is calculated must be a final judgment.” “Our view is consistent with the statute’s philosophy of providing compensation from a point at which the loss-causing defendant’s liability is entered on record.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1091 , 114 …
cited Cited "see" Santopietro v. United States
D. Conn. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See 510 U.S. 1092 , 114 S.Ct. 921 -922, 127 L.Ed.2d 215 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Connell v. East River Savings Bank
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
We thus point to an unbroken line of decisions holding that “[i]n order to recover treble damages [and counsel fees] under the antitrust laws, a plaintiff must show a violation of the antitrust laws, the fact of damage, and some indication of the amount of damage.” Response of Carolina, Inc. v. Leasco Response, Inc., 537 F.2d 1307, 1320 (5th Cir.1976); see also In re Lower Lake Erie Iron Ore Antitrust Litigation, 998 F.2d 1144, 1176 (3rd Cir.) (“[O]ne pursuing antitrust recovery must establish that the damages suffered were caused by the defendant’s participation in a scheme repugnant …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marshall
v.
Nelson Electric
93-662.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1994.
510 U.S. 1092
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)

510 U.S. 1092

Marshall
v.
Nelson Electric et al.

No. 93-662.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 24, 1994.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 10th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 999 F. 2d 547.