green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES ex rel. [REDACTED] v. [REDACTED]
See Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 10 F.3d 338, 354 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 914 , 115 S.Ct. 295 , 130 L.Ed.2d 205 (1994) (concluding that Brady applied in denaturalization and extradition cases based on proof of alleged criminal activities of the party proceeded against); Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. FTC, 256 F.Supp. 136, 142 (S.D.N.Y.1966) (“Presumably the essentials of due process at the administrative level require similar [Brady ] disclosures by the agency where consistent with the public interest.
cited
Cited "see"
Ligorner v. Reno
Id.; see Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 10 F.3d 338 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied sub nom Rison v. Demjanjuk, 513 U.S. 914 , 115 S.Ct. 295 , 130 L.Ed.2d 205 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,310, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6865, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,226 in Re Syntex Corp. Securities Litigation. Arthur M. Rosenbaum Richard Gorosh, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated Kenneth Wynne Judy Wynne Robert Younger Jerrald Schaffer Joseph Cocola Rita Cocola Robert K. Greenfield Amy Tresti Alan R. Tresti Steven J. Gutter Carol Morris Nicholas J. Donohue G. King Perry Henry Cole Bori Berkow and Eric Rose v. Syntex Corporation Paul E. Freiman James N. Wilson John Fried Marvyn Carton Allen & Company Incorporated and Thomas Gutshall
See Sawtell v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 22 F.3d 248, 253 (10th Cir.) (statute of limitations was not tolled because proposed plaintiff was a New Mexico resident and the class action had been brought on behalf of Minnesota residents only), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 917 , 115 S.Ct. 295 , 130 L.Ed.2d 209 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosenbaum v. Syntex Corp.
See Sawtell v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 22 F.3d 248, 253 (10th Cir.) (statute of limitations was not tolled because proposed plaintiff was a New Mexico resident and the class action had been brought on behalf of Minnesota residents only), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 295 , 130 L.Ed.2d 209 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2570, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4282 Wang Zong Xiao v. Janet Reno, in Her Capacity as Attorney General of the United States Michael J. Yamaguchi, in His Capacity as United States Attorney for the Northern District of California Reginald L. Boyd, in His Capacity as United States Marshal for the Northern District of California Doris Meissner, in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, and David Ilchert, in His Capacity as District Director for the Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 10 F.3d 338, 355 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 295 , 130 L.Ed.2d 205 (1994) (prosecuting attorneys engaged in prosecutorial misconduct when they recklessly disregarded their obligation to provide information specifically requested by detainee, thereby endangering detainee's defense).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wang Zong Xiao v. Reno
See Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 10 F.3d 338, 355 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 295 , 130 L.Ed.2d 205 (1994) (prosecuting attorneys engaged in prosecutorial misconduct when they recklessly disregarded their obligation to provide information specifically requested by detainee, thereby endangering detainee’s defense).
cited
Cited "see"
Sonja Lujan, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kimberly Lujan, Deceased v. Regents of the University of California
See Sawtell v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 22 F.3d 248, 250 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 295 , 130 L.Ed.2d 209 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vytautas Gecas
(2×)
See, e.g., Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 10 F.3d 338, 340 (6th Cir.1993) (noting that Israel sought and obtained the extradition of an alleged Nazi prison guard), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 914 , 115 S.Ct. 295 , 130 L.Ed.2d 205 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Voakes
v.
AT&T Communications, Inc.
v.
AT&T Communications, Inc.
No. 94-239.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Con, Consideration, Took.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Con-nor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.