green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Haggerty v. Williams
See Hill v. Hill, 35 Conn. App. 160, 172 , 644 A.2d 951 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 914 , 648 A.2d 153 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1059 , 115 S. Ct. 669 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Foster v. Foster
See Hill v. Hill, 35 Conn. App. 160, 163 , 644 A.2d 951 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 914 , 648 A.2d 153 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1059 , 115 S. Ct. 669 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. 152 Char-Nor Manor Blvd. Chestertown, Md.
“Without risk of a determination of guilt, jeopardy does not attach, and neither an appeal nor further prosecution constitutes double jeopardy.” Serfass, 420 U.S. at 391-92 , 95 S.Ct. at 1064 ; accord United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diana Gonzales Buchanan, Fedell Anderson, Vernon Bonner, and John Buchanan
See United States v. Gonzalez, No. 94-60342, 1996 WL 30687 at *2 (5th Cir., Jan. 26, 1996) (stating that the “defendant must be a party to the forfeiture proceeding for jeopardy to attach”); United States v. Arreola-Ramos, 60 F.3d 188, 193 (5th Cir.1995) (holding that "as Arreola did not appear and contest the forfeiture, he was never in jeopardy"); accord United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.) (holding that, "as a non-party, Torres was not at risk in the forfeiture proceeding”), cert. denied - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994); United States v. Baird, 63 F.3…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dean J. Smith
See United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994) (dictum).
cited
Cited "see"
Echols v. Dwyer
See Sullivan v. United States, 21 F.3d 198 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 670 , 130 L.Ed.2d 604 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Austin
See United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994); see also Gainer, 904 F.Supp. 1234 ; Hardwell, 1995 WL 463666 , at *3 & n. 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramirez v. State
See United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994) (where forfeiture proceeding followed guilty plea and incarceration on drug offenses, held: no double jeopardy violation because after receiving notice of forfeiture proceeding, Torres made no claim; did not become a party to the forfeiture; and property was forfeited without trial or opposition; such that forfeiture proceeding never placed Torres in jeopardy); see also United States v. Walsh, 873 F.Supp. 334, 336-37 (D.Ariz.1994) and United States v. Nakamoto, 876 F.Supp.…
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. United States
See Sullivan v. United States, 21 F.3d 198 , 201 n. 6 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 670 , 130 L.Ed.2d 604 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One Parcel of Real Property
See United States v. Torres, 28 *1080 F.3d 1463 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994) (noting that forfeiture and civil fines can be penalties and noting that after Austin and Kurth Ranch the government should be aware of the "hazards” of commencing separate criminal prosecutions and civil forfeiture proceedings).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Silvano Salinas
(2×)
See United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Annamma A. Ezekiel and Al Ezekiel v. Jaime T. Michel and United States of America
See Sullivan v. United States, 21 F.3d 198, 201 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, —, 115 S.Ct. 670 , 130 L.Ed.2d 604 (1994); Quilico, 749 F.2d at 485-87 (examining the congressional intent and the statutory scheme in determining whether physicians and surgeons appointed to the VA Department of Medicine and Surgery for a fixed period of time (duration of residency commitment) are immune from liability by FTCA).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Falkowski
Accord United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463 (7th Cir.1994) cert. denied — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994); See also United States v. Cretacci, 62 F.3d 307, 310 (9th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera v. United States
See United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463 (7th Cir.) (no double jeopardy in violation of Fifth Amendment where defendant filed no claim in civil administrative forfeiture proceedings), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994); see also United States v. Nakamoto, 876 F.Supp. 235, 238-39 (D.Haw.1995) (no double jeopardy where defendant did not contest forfeiture of seized property and thereby “avoided putting his guilt or innocence at issue in a judicial forfeiture proceeding involving the defendant as a party and carrying potential ‘punishment’ at the end”); Unit…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guy Jerome Ursery
See United States v. Tamez, 881 F.Supp. 460, 466 (E.D.Wash. 1995) (holding that jeopardy attached to stipulated civil forfeiture when court entered the decree of forfeiture). 14 Nor does the Seventh Circuit's holding in United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994), support the argument that jeopardy did not attach to the judgment of forfeiture in the instant case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Paige v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Torres, 28 F.8d 1463, *304 1465 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael G. Morgan
Etim v. United States, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 72 , 130 L.Ed.2d 27 (1994); accord United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465-66 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994); but see United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, 33 F.3d 1210, 1221-22 (9th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.
See Serfass v. United States, 420 U.S. 377, 390-91 , 95 S.Ct. 1055, 1063-64 , 43 L.Ed.2d 265 (1975). “[Jjeopardy does not attach until a defendant is ‘put to trial before the trier of the facts, whether the trier be a jury or a judge.’” Id. at 391 , 95 S.Ct. at 1064 ; see also United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1464 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1059 , 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994) (stating that in civil cases jeopardy attaches “when evidence is first presented to the trier of fact in a proceeding seeking to impose a penalty for crime.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bond
See United States v. Wong, 62 F.3d 1212, 1214 (9th Cir.1995) (“[Jjeopardy attaches in [a] criminal action at the time [the] guilty plea is accepted by the court.”) (alterations added) (citing United States v. Smith, 912 F.2d 322, 324 (9th Cir.1990)); see also United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.) (“You can’t have double jeopardy without a former jeopardy.”), ce rt. denied, - U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferreira v. Superior Court
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463, 1465 (7th Cir.1994), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 1059 , 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994); United States v. Walsh, 873 F.Supp. 334, 336-37 (D.Ariz.1994); United States v. Kemmish, 869 F.Supp. 803, 806 (S.D.Cal.1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Miranda-Beltran
See also United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. O'Rourke
See also United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994) and United States v. Ursery, 59 F.3d 568 (6th Cir.1995), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 762 , 133 L.Ed.2d 707 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. O'ROURKE
See also United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994) and United States v. Ursery, 59 F.3d 568 (6th Cir.1995), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 762 , 133 L.Ed.2d 707 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James
The court concluded that the forfeiture of abandoned property does not constitute punishment and therefore “cannot be said to implicate the former owner’s double jeopardy rights.” Id. at 310-11 ; see also United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463 (7th Cir.) (“[T]he $60,000 was forfeited without opposition, and jeopardy did not attach.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994); United States v. Walsh, 873 F.Supp 334, 337 (D.Ariz.1994) (holding defendant “was not placed in jeopardy nor ‘punished’ in a constitutional sense” because defendant failed to make …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Walter Baritsky v. United States
See, e.g., Sullivan v. United States, 21 F.3d 198, 206 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 670 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt, James Wren, Payback Mines, Claimants-Appellants
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Torres, 28 F.3d 1463 (7th Cir.) (Easterbrook, J., suggesting that Austin, Halper and Kurth Ranch together may require as a practical matter that all forfeitures be initiated through criminal proceedings), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 669 , 130 L.Ed.2d 603 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION, LIMITED
v.
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE, etc.
v.
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE, etc.
No. 94-851.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1994.
Cited by 122 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.