green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Regis v. United States
To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must (1) overcome a “strong presumption” that his attorney’s conduct was reasonable and show that the representation “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness” under “prevailing professional norms”; and (2) “affirmatively prove prejudice,” that is, show “a reasonable probability that but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-89, 693-94 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); accord, e.g., …
discussed
Cited "see"
Abdullahi Ex Rel. Estate of Mohamed v. City of Madison
See Plakas v. Drinski, 19 F.3d 1143, 1147 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994): "The award of summary judgment to the defense in deadly force cases may be made only with particular care where the officer defendant is the only witness left alive to testify.
cited
Cited "see"
Collier v. United States
See id. (citing Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Franza v. Stinson
Franza’s objection here boils down to his view that this section in counsel’s brief “was not worthy of inclusion.” (Coram Nobis Aff. ¶ 54; accord, Coram Nobis Br. at 57.) Even if that were true, inclusion of a weaker argument leads to a finding of ineffective assistance only if appellate counsel “omitted significant and obvious issues while pursuing issues that were clearly and significantly weaker.” Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994); see also cases cited at page 13 above.
cited
Cited "see"
Steele v. Walter
See Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Fletcher v. Mann
See Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ehinger v. Miller
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walsh
See United States v. Brandon, 17 F.3d 409 , 424 n. 11 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Benn v. Stinson
See Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Gerald Broyles v. Samuel Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections Attorney General for the State of Arizona
See Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.1994) ("a petitioner may establish constitutionally inadequate performance if he shows that [appellate] counsel omitted significant and obvious issues while pursuing issues that were clearly and significantly weaker"), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 81 (1994); Matire v. Wainwright, 811 F.2d 1430, 1438 (11th Cir.1987) (court's finding of deficient performance "is bolstered by the fact that appellate counsel's brief on direct appeal raised only a single, weak issue, notwithstanding the fact that a substantial, meritorious Fifth Amendment issue was obvious…
discussed
Cited "see"
Theodore Abbott Jones v. Gary Stotts, Mike Nelson, and Attorney General of Kansas
See Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994); cf. Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 375, 382-83 , 106 S.Ct. 2574, 2582, 2586-87 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986) (while petitioner may not raise Fourth Amendment claim on collateral attack if State has provided full and fair litigation of issue, Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 494-95 , 96 S.Ct. 3037, 3052-53 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1976), he may raise it to support ineffective assistance of counsel claim). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
William and Rita ESPEAIGNNETTE, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. GENE TIERNEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Appellee
See United, States v. Brandon, 17 F.3d 409, 444 (1st Cir.), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 80 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 , and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994); Fed.R.Evid. 104(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Espeaignnette v. Tierney
See United States v. Brandon, 17 F.3d ___ _____________ _______ 409, 444 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 80 , and cert. _____ ______ ___ _____ denied, 115 S. Ct. 81 (1994); Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Espeaignnette v. Tierney
See United States v. Brandon, 17 F.3d 409, 444 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 80 , and cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 81 (1994); Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Barnett v. United States
See Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rolling v. Fischer
See, e.g., Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ray v. State
(2×)
Compare United States v. Legarda, 17 F.3d 496, 499 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994) (error in excluding defense evidence harmless where substance of excluded evidence was eventually allowed into evidence).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawrence v. Artuz
See, e.g., Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Avincola v. Stinson
See, e.g., Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994); Torres v. Irvin, 1998 WL 824527 at *22 ; Hurd v. Keane, 97 Civ. 2991, 1997 WL 582825 at *2 (S.D.N.Y Sept.19, 1997) (Scheindlin, D.J.); Ehinger v. Miller, 942 F.Supp. 925, 932 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (Mukasey, J. & Peck, M.J.); Benn v. Stinson, 917 F.Supp. 202 , *148 205 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (Stein, J. & Peck, M.J.).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick W. McKee Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., See Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Torres v. Irvin
See, e.g., Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994); Ehinger v. Miller, 942 F.Supp. 925, 932-33 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (Muka- *278 sey, D.J. & Peck, M.J.); Benn v. Stinson, 917 F.Supp. 202, 205 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (Stein, D.J. & Peck, M.J.).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Geraci v. Senkowski
See, e.g., Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. Hanslmaier
See, e.g., Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 820 , 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994); Ehinger v. Miller, 942 F.Supp. 925, 932-33 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (Mukasey, J. & Peck, M.J.); Benn v. Stinson, 917 F.Supp. 202, 205 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (Stein, J. & Peck, M.J.). 3 Appellate counsel is not required to raise every colorable claim urged by the client, but is entitled to focus on key issues while “winnowing out weaker arguments.” E.g., Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751-53 , 103 S.Ct. 3308, 3312-13 , 77 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983); Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d at 533 ; Ehinger…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald Mason v. Craig A. Hanks
(2×)
See, e.g., Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528, 537 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 35 (1994); Claudio v. Scully, 982 F.2d 798, 806 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 912 , 113 S.Ct. 2347 , 124 L.Ed.2d 256 (1993); Fagan v. Washington, 942 F.2d 1155, 1156 (7th Cir.1991); Barry v. Brower, 864 F.2d 294, 300-01 (3d Cir.1988); Matire v. Wainwright, 811 F.2d 1430, 1439 (11th Cir.1987); Grady v. Artuz, 931 F.Supp. 1048, 1053-54 (S.D.N.Y.1996); Laffosse v. Walters, 585 F.Supp. 1209, 1214 (S.D.N.Y.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Hilaire, etc. v. City of Laconia
Id.; see also Plakas v. Drinski, 19 F.3d 1143, 1150 (7th Cir.) ("[W]e carve up the incident into segments and judge each on its own terms to see if the officer was reasonable at each stage."), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 81 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Hilaire, etc. v. City of Laconia
Id.; see also Plakas v. ___ ___ ____ ______ Drinski, 19 F.3d 1143 , 1150 (7th Cir.) ("[W]e carve up the _______ incident into segments and judge each on its own terms to see if the officer was reasonable at each stage."), cert. denied, _____ ______ 115 S. Ct. 81 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patriarca
See, e.g., United States v. Brandon, 17 F.3d 409 , 451-52 and n. 72 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 80 and 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994) (in order to prove knowledge based on alleged “willful blindness,” it must be shown that the defendant was aware of a high probability of the fact in question and deliberately avoided learning the fact; mere negligence is not enough).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kathy St. Hilaire, Etc. v. City of Laconia
Id.; see also Plakas v. Drinski, 19 F.3d 1143, 1150 (7th Cir.) (“[W]e carve up the incident into segments and judge each on its own terms to see if the officer was reasonable at each stage.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Higinio Romero v. Board Of County Commissioners Of The County Of Lake
Evidence that DeFabbo failed to arrest and handcuff Romero prior to the threat is not relevant to the reasonableness of DeFabbo's decision to shoot Romero. 5 See id.; see also Plakas v. Drinski, 19 F.3d 1143, 1150 (7th Cir.) (refusing to examine events prior to threat against the officer to determine whether officer could have avoided situation which led to use of deadly force), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994); Greenidge v. Ruffin, 927 F.2d 789, 792 (4th Cir.1991) (holding officer's failure to follow standard arrest procedures is not relevant to whether office…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romero v. Board of County Commissioners
Evidence that DeFabbo failed to arrest and handcuff Romero prior to the threat is not relevant to the reasonableness of DeFabbo’s decision to shoot Romero. 5 See id.; see also Plakas v. Drinski 19 F.3d 1143, 1150 (7th Cir.) (refusing to examine events prior to threat against the officer to determine whether officer could have avoided situation which led to use of deadly force), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994); Greenidge v. Ruffin, 927 F.2d 789, 792 (4th Cir.1991) (holding officer’s failure to follow standard arrest procedures is not relevant to whether office…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maravilla v. United States
Id. at 396 , 109 S.Ct. at 1872 ; see also Plakas v. Drinski, 19 F.3d 1143, 1146 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994) (officer may use deadly force where he has probable cause to believe that the suspect “poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maravilla v. United States
Id. at 396 , 109 S.Ct. at 1872 ; see also Plakas v. Drinski, 19 F.3d 1143, 1146 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994) (officer may use deadly force where he has probable cause to believe that the suspect "poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shawn Michael Jones, a Minor by His Father and Next Friend, Terry D. Jones, and Terry D. Jones v. Charles Webb, Individually
We must allow for “the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments — in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving — about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation.” Id. at 397 , 109 S.Ct. at 1872 ; see also Plakas v. Drinski, 19 F.3d 1143, 1149 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 81 , 130 L.Ed.2d 34 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Conley D. Wolfswinkel
See, e.g., United States v. Brandon, 17 F.3d 409, 426 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 81 , — L.Ed.2d - (1994); United States v. Barakett, 994 F.2d 1107, 1110-11 (5th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 701 , 126 L.Ed.2d 668 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility
v.
Mayo
v.
Mayo
No. 93-2007.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.