green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.7 score
“giv full play to the right of the jury to determine credibility”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. O'Brien
giv full play to the right of the jury to determine credibility
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sapp
See United States v. Murphy, 35 F.3d 143 (4th Cir.1994) (officer in local jail under contract with U.S. Marshal’s service fell under section 1114’s protection of any person “employed to assist” a U.S. Marshal or deputy marshal), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1135 , 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 897 (1995); United States v. Schaffer, 664 F.2d 824 (11th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (guard in hospital under contract to serve federal prisoners protected as person assisting an officer or employee of the Department of Justice).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hampton v. Commonwealth
See United States v. Murphy, 35 F.3d 143, 147 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1135 , 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 897 (1995) (steel cell bars); People v. Galvin, 65 N.Y.2d 761 , 492 N.Y.S.2d 25 , 481 N.E.2d 565 (1985) (sidewalk); People v. Coe, 165 A.D.2d 721 , 564 N.Y.S.2d 255 (1990) (plate-glass window); People v. O’Hagan, 176 A.D.2d 179 , 574 N.Y.S.2d 198 (1991) (cell bars); State v. Brinson, 337 N.C. 764 , 448 S.E.2d 822 (1994) (cell bars and floor); State v. Reed, 101 Or.App. 277 , 790 P.2d 551 (1990) (sidewalk).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martha Molina
See United States v. King, 36 F.3d 728, 732 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1135 , 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 896 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martha Molina, Also Known as Martha Molina Derangel, United States of America v. Sergio Rolando Fraga, United States of America v. Luis Marinae Corona, Also Known as Jorge Carrio, Pedro Dajer, George Carrio
See United States v. King, 36 F.3d 728, 732 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1135 , 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 896 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Beck
See United States v. King, 36 F.3d 728, 732 (8th Cir.1994) (explaining that “[a]n out-of-court statement is not considered hearsay if it is admitted not for its truth but for the limited purpose of explaining to a jury why a police investigation was undertaken.” Such non-hearsay statements may include “background information laying the basis for the obtaining of the search warrant and information which could have led to the request by the agent for the search warrant and the subsequent issuance [thereof].”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1135 , 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 896 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Beck
See United States v. King, 36 F.3d 728, 732 (8th Cir. 1994) (explaining that "[a]n out-of-court statement is not considered hearsay if it is admitted not for its truth but for the limited purpose of explaining to a jury why a police investigation was undertaken." Such non-hearsay statements may include "background information laying the basis for the obtaining of the search warrant and information which could have led to the request by the agent for the search 11 warrant and the subsequent issuance [thereof]."), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 954 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario Ernesto Villabona-Alvarado
See United States v. Leung, 35 F.3d 1402, 1407 (9th Cir.1994) (organization extending from Hong Kong to Los Angeles to Vancouver responsible for importing and distributing 56 kilograms of heroin satisfies otherwise extensive criminal activity under 3 3B1.1(a)), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 954 (1995). 8 While the district court did not rule on the basis that the criminal activity was otherwise extensive, this court may uphold the district court's ruling based on any ground supported in the record.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre Lamont Brown
See United States v. King, 36 F.3d 728, 732 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 896 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre Lamont Brown
See United States v. King, 36 F.3d -4- 728, 732 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 954 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Flores-Acosta
See United States v. Leung, 35 F.3d 1402, 1405 (9th Cir.1994) (stating that a reviewing court should not upset a jury's credibility determination), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 954 (1995); United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 973 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that it is the jury's "proper prerogative" to believe a witness where the jury is aware of the challenges to a witness's credibility), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987); United States v. Burns, 701 F.2d 840, 842 (9th Cir.) ("Credibility of witnesses and the weight accorded the evidence ... are questions for the jury that are not reviewable."), cer…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre Walker
See United States v. Leung, 35 F.3d 1402, 1405 (9th Cir.1994) (stating that a reviewing court should not upset a jury's credibility determination), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 954 (1995); United States v. Lopez, 803 F.2d 969, 973 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that it is the jury's "proper prerogative" to believe a witness where the jury is aware of the challenges to a witness's credibility), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1030 (1987); United States v. Burns, 701 F.2d 840, 842 (9th Cir.) ("Credibility of witnesses and the weight accorded the evidence ... are questions for the jury that are not reviewable."), cer…
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonardo RICARDO, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Killion, 30 F.3d 844, 846 (7th Cir. *1417 1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 896 (1995) (noting significance of the retroactivity of Custis to Custis’s case).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paws With A Cause v. Crumpler
(2×)
See United States v. Murphy, 35 F.3d 143, 145 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 954 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paws With a Cause, Inc. v. Donna J. Crumpler, and Robo Dogs, Inc. William R. Jackson Virginia Canines for Independence William I. Sydnor
(2×)
See United States v. Murphy, 35 F.3d 143, 145 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 954 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Martinez, United States of America v. Augustin Nava, United States of America v. Alan Clark, United States of America v. Jose Manuel Limon-Uriarte
See United States v. Leung, 35 F.3d 1402, 1406 (9th Cir.1994) (upholding leader or organizer adjustment where it was supported by evidence in the record, and defendant did not present controverting facts), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 954 (1995). 1 B.
cited
Cited "see"
Matista v. United States
See United States v. Podlog, 35 F.3d 699, 705 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied [— U.S.-], 115 S.Ct. 954 [ 130 L.Ed.2d 897 ] (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher Moore
See United States v. Podlog, 35 F.3d 699, 705 (2d Cir.1994), *101 ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 897 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodolfo Garcia, A/K/A Rafael Guereca, and Jose Rivera
See United States v. Killion, 30 F.3d 844, 846 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 954 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lizalde
In order to establish a claim of duress, a defendant must show that “(a) at the time of his conduct he was subjected to actual or threatened force, (b) the force or threat was of such a nature as to induce a well-founded fear of impending death or serious bodily harm, and (c) there was no reasonable opportunity to escape from the force or threat other than by engaging in the otherwise unlawful activity.” United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1344 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 991 , 111 S.Ct. 535 , 112 L.Ed.2d 545 (1990); see also United States v. Podlog, 35 F.3d 699, 704 (2d Cir.19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cambrelen
See, e.g., United States v. Podlog, 35 F.3d 699, 705 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1135 , 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 897 (1995); United States v. Brown, 776 F.2d 397, 403 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1793 , 90 L.Ed.2d 339 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Best
See, e.g., United States v. Podlog, 35 F.3d 699, 705 (2d Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 1135 , 115 S.Ct. 954 , 130 L.Ed.2d 897 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Sopko
See, e.g., United States v. Podlog, 35 F.3d 699, 705 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 954 (1995); United States v. Brown, 776 F.2d 397, 403 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1141 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herbert D. Morris, Jr.
See also United States v. Killion, 30 F.3d 844, 846 (7th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 954 (1995) (noting that Custis may have further narrowed Mitchell by prohibiting collateral challenges even to ineffective assistance of counsel claims); United States v. Mitchell, 18 F.3d 1355, 1361 (7th Cir. 1994) (guidelines), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 640 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wai Chong Leung
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-7336.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1995.
Cited by 44 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.