green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Gardner
(2×)
These Justices suggest that certiorari may have been denied only because the Louisiana decision does not represent a final judgment in the case, as in this instance "[p]etitioner has been neither convicted of nor sentenced for any crime." Bethley, ___ U.S. at ___, 117 S.Ct. at 2426 (statement by Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ.). [1] See Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263, 276, 284-85 , 100 S.Ct. 1133, 1140, 1144-45 , 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980) (upholding constitutionality of mandatory life sentence under recidivist statute; "the interest of the [state] here is not simply that of making [the underly…
discussed
Cited "see"
Borchardt v. State
(2×)
See Bethley v. Louisiana, 520 U.S. 1259 , 117 S.Ct. 2425 , 138 L.Ed.2d 188 (1997) (explaining that it is well settled that the Supreme Court’s decision to deny certiorari “does not in any sense constitute a ruling on the merits of the case in which the writ is sought”); Barber v. Tennessee, 513 U.S. 1184 , 115 S.Ct. 1177 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1995) (restating the “settled proposition” that a denial of certiorari “does not constitute a ruling on the merits”); see also discussion, supra, pp. 106 -110.
cited
Cited "see"
Michael S. Menzer v. United States
See United States v. Hicks, 106 F.3d 187, 189-90 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2425 , 138 L.Ed.2d 188 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher Dascenzo A.K.A. Christopher Marcus Dascenzo
See United States v. Hicks, 106 F.3d 187, 190 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2425 , 138 L.Ed.2d 188 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dascenzo
See United States v. Hicks, 106 F.3d 187, 190 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2425 , 138 L.Ed.2d 188 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dascenzo
See United States v. Hicks, 106 F.3d 187, 190 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 2425 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Zaragoza
As Judge Kanne has noted for the court, such a situation “is virtually a per se reckless endangerment of others.” United States v. Golden, 954 F.2d 1413, 1417 (7th Cir.1992); accord United States v. Hicks, 106 F.3d 187, 191 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2425 , 138 L.Ed.2d 188 (1997). 1 As did the panel in Steele, 91 F.3d at 1051-52 , and the panel in Altier, 91 F.3d at 957-58 , we believe the evidence of record amply supports the district court’s determination that Mr. Zaragoza knowingly “created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.” U.S.S.G. § 2K1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Highler v. State
See, e.g., State v. Palmer, 496 N.E.2d 1337, 1341 (Ind.Ct.App.1986) (in the context of waiver). [9] In Bethley v. Louisiana, 520 U.S. 1259, 1259 , 117 S.Ct. 2425 , 138 L.Ed.2d 188 (1997), the United States Supreme Court acknowledged that its decision to deny a petition for writ of certiorari does not, in any sense, constitute a ruling on the merits of the case in which the writ was sought. [10] Because religion-based constitutional challenges generally are raised under the free exercise or establishment clauses of the first amendment to the United States constitution, "[r]eligious discriminati…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chowdhury
See Russell, 471 U.S. at 862 , 105 S.Ct. at 2457 ; see also United States v. Hicks, 106 F.3d 187, 189 (7th Cir.1997) (“[T]he activity regulated by the arson statute is the burning of property used in or affecting commerce, and it doesn’t take any fancy intellectual footwork to conclude that the aggregate effect of such arsons on commerce is substantial.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2425 , 138 L.Ed.2d 188 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kapral v. United States
See, e.g., Bethley v. Louisiana, - U.S. -, -, 117 S.Ct. 2425, 2426 , 138 L.Ed.2d 188 (1997) (defined for purposes of determining Supreme Court jurisdiction over state criminal actions as "the imposition of the sentence”); Christy v. Horn, 115 F.3d 201, 203 (3d Cir.1997) (citation omitted) (defined for purposes of appealing a district court's decision of a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as "a decision by the district court that ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute judgment”); Morales-Alvarado v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 655 F.2d 172, 17…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ferret-Castellanos
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-8866.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1997.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.