green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"screening procedure was reasonably designed to respond to [security] concerns"
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Fernandes
screening procedure was reasonably designed to respond to concerns
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES v. RAFAEL PAGÁN-SANTINI
See United States v. DeLuca, 137 F.3d 24, 38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 874 , 119 S.Ct. 174 , 142 L.Ed.2d 142 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ray
See United States v. DeLuca, 137 F.3d 24 , 37 n. 14 (1st Cir.) (holding that the objection to jury instructions by a codefen-dant preserves the issue for appeal when defendants agreed at the onset of trial that one defendant’s objection would apply for all), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 874 , 119 S.Ct. 174 , 142 L.Ed.2d 142 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Concepcion v. United States
See United States v. Desimone, 119 F.3d 217, 228 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 874 , 119 S.Ct. 174 , 142 L.Ed.2d 142 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Cohen
See, e.g., United States v. DeLuca, 137 F.3d 24, 33-34 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 525 U.S. 874 (1998); Woods v. Kuhlmann, 977 F.2d 74, 76 (2d Cir. 1992); State v. Mahkuk, 736 N.W.2d 675, 684-685 (Minn. 2007); People v. Jones, 96 N.Y.2d 213, 219 (2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaw ex rel. Estate of Stroud v. Coosa County Commission
See, e.g., Turquitt v. Jefferson County, Ala., 137 F.3d 1285, 1289 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, 525 U.S. 874 , 119 S.Ct. 174 , 142 L.Ed.2d 142 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaw v. COOSA COUNTY COM'N.
See, e.g., Turquitt v. Jefferson County, Ala., 137 F.3d 1285, 1289 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 874 , 119 S.Ct. 174 , 142 L.Ed.2d 142 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaw v. Coosa County Commission
See, e.g., Turquitt v. Jefferson County, Ala., 137 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 874 , 119 S.Ct. 174 , 142 L.Ed.2d 142 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Upper Deck Co., LLC. v. Federal Ins. Co.
P. 56(d); see also California v. Campbell, 138 F.3d 772 , 780 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 874 , 119 S.Ct. 173 , 142 L.Ed.2d 141 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Lanhorn
Were we to review these claims, we would find that the court’s ruling that defendant’s family members could enter only upon submission to a screening procedure was not even a partial closure, since no one was excluded, and was in any event proper (People v Perez, 245 AD2d 71 , lv denied 91 NY2d 976 ; see also, United States v DeLuca, 137 F3d 24, 32-35 , cert denied 525 US 874; United States v Brazel, 102 F3d 1120, 1155-1156 , cert denied 522 US 822 ), and we would also find that the brief exclusion of certain attorneys associated with counsel for the codefendant who sought entry in the mid…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Best
See, e.g., United States v. Desimone, 119 F.3d 217, 223 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 874 , 119 S.Ct. 174 , 142 L.Ed.2d 142 (1998); United States v. Abelis, 146 F.3d 73, 80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1009 , 119 S.Ct. 527 , 142 L.Ed.2d 437 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Zichettello, Frank Richardone, Ronald Reale, Richard Hartman, James J. Lysaght, and Peter Kramer
The evidence must be viewed “ ‘in the light most favorable to the government,’ drawing all inferences and resolving all issues of credibility in the government’s favor.” Id. (citations omitted); see also United States v. Desimone, 119 F.3d 217, 223 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 874, 119 S.Ct. 174 , 142 L.Ed.2d 142 (1998); United States v. Gordon, 987 F.2d 902, 906 (2d Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Western Resources, Inc., Receiver of the Assets of the Victor Muscat Testamentary Trusts
v.
California
v.
California
No. 98-132.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1998.
525 U.S. 874
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.