Byrd v. Cantu, 525 U.S. 963 (1998). · Go Syfert
Byrd v. Cantu, 525 U.S. 963 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Parker v. City of Pomona (ca9, 2003-07-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Parker v. City of Pomona
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Byrd v. Guess, 137 F.3d 1126, 1133-34 (9th Cir.), cert, denied sub nom., 525 U.S. 963 , 119 S.Ct. 405 , 142 L.Ed.2d 329 (1998), abrogated on other grounds by Lewis, 523 U.S. at 833 , 118 S.Ct. 1708 .
discussed Cited "see" Louis Eze v. Daniel A. Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Snowden v. Singletary, 135 F.3d 732, 737-39 (11th Cir.) (granting a habeas petition in part because expert testified that 99.5% of children tell the truth regarding sexual abuse allegations), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 963 , 119 S.Ct. 405 , 142 L.Ed.2d 329 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Benigno Munoz v. Oceanside Resorts, Inc.
11th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Turlington v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 135 F.3d 1428, 1432 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S.Ct. 405 , 142 L.Ed.2d 329 (1998) (applying the McDonnell Douglas framework to an ADEA claim).
discussed Cited "see" Benigno Munoz v. Oceanside Resorts, Inc. (2×)
11th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Turlington v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 135 F.3d 1428, 1432 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S. Ct. 405 (1998) (applying the McDonnell Douglas framework to an ADEA claim).
discussed Cited "see" Braggs v. Attorney General OK
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Snowden v. Singletary, 135 F.3d 732, 737 (11th Cir.) (noting a procedural bar does not amount to exhaustion if “there is a reasonable possibility that an exception to the procedural bar may still be available to the petitioner”), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 405 (1998); Lambert v. Blackwell, 134 F.3d 506, 519 (3d Cir. 1998) (holding that federal court should dismiss a petition if it is uncertain how a state court would resolve the procedural default issue), petition for cert. filed (S. Ct. Apr. 23, 1998) (No. 97-8812). -4- Mr. Braggs has failed to adequately exhaust available state remedie…
discussed Cited "see" Terry Joe Braggs v. The Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma Gary Cardinale James Saffle
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Snowden v. Singletary, 135 F.3d 732, 737 (11th Cir.) (noting a procedural bar does not amount to exhaustion if "there is a reasonable possibility that an exception to the procedural bar may still be available to the petitioner"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 405 , 142 L.Ed.2d 329 (1998); Lambert v. Blackwell, 134 F.3d 506, 519 (3d Cir.1998) (holding that federal court should dismiss a petition if it is uncertain how a state court would resolve the procedural default issue), petition for cert. filed (S.Ct.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Royal Insurance v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.
6th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Itel Container Corp. v. M/V Titan Scan, 139 F.3d 1450, 1454-55 (11th Cir.) (reading the general clause paramount to apply the Hague-Visby Rules in part because of the presence of a forum-selection clause applying English law that was more specific than the general boilerplate language of the clause paramount), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S.Ct. 405 , 142 L.Ed.2d 328 (1998); Francosteel Corp., 885 F.Supp. at 89-90 (construing a bill of lading against the carrier to find that the contract incorporated the Hague-Visby Rules); Associated Metals v. M/V Star Skarven, 1995 *427 A.M.C. …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.
unknown court · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Itel Container Corp. v. M/V Titan Scan, 139 F.3d 1450, 1454-55 (11th Cir.) (reading the general clause paramount to apply the Hague-Visby Rules in part because of the presence of a forum-selection clause applying English law that was more specific than the general boilerplate language of the clause paramount), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 962 , 119 S.Ct. 405 , 142 L.Ed.2d 328 (1998); Francosteel Corp., 885 F.Supp. at 89-90 (construing a bill of lading against the carrier to find that the contract incorporated the Hague-Visby Rules); Associated Metals v. M/V Star Skarven, 1995 A.M.C. 505 ,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Byrd
v.
Cantu
No. 98-260.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1998.
525 U.S. 963
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.