Mankarious v. United States, 525 U.S. 1056 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Mankarious v. United States, 525 U.S. 1056 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Lemoine (lactapp, 2015-05-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lemoine
La. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Mankarious, 151 F.3d 694, 705 (7th Cir.1998) [cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1056 , 119 S.Ct. 621 , 142 L.Ed.2d 560 (1998) ] (“Money laundering requires proceeds of a discrete predicate crime.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Zapata-Ibarra
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Nichols, 142 F.3d 857, 867 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 119 S.Ct. 621 (1998) ("Although a reasonable conclusion of proximity to the border does not alone constitute reasonable suspicion for a Border Patrol stop that is not at the border or its functional equivalent, this 'vital element' contributes significantly to the reasonableness of the Border Patrol agents' suspicions."). 12 The second Brignoni-Ponce factor, characteristics of the area in which Zertuche encountered Zapata-Ibarra, also weighs in favor of the existence of reasonable suspicion.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Zapata-Ibarra
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Nichols, 142 F.3d 857, 867 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1056 , 119 S.Ct. 621 , 142 L.Ed.2d 560 (1998) (“Although a reasonable conclusion of proximity to the border does not alone constitute reasonable suspicion for a Border Patrol stop that is not at the border or its functional equivalent, this ‘vital element’ contributes significantly to the reasonableness of the Border Patrol agents’ suspicions.”).
cited Cited "see" Goodson v. City of Corpus Christi
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Nichols, 142 F.3d 857, 864-65 (5th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 621 , 142 L.Ed.2d 560 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Maali
M.D. Fla. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
The starting point for the court’s analysis in Christo was its understanding that “[mjoney laundering is an offense to be punished separately from an underlying criminal offense.” Id. at 580 (refusing to find that “money laundering is inherent in bank fraud or misapplication of funds”); see also United States v. Mankarious, 151 F.3d 694, 704 (7th Cir.) (finding that the requirement under Christo makes certain that “[a] money launderer must obtain proceeds before laundering [them].”), cert. denied 525 U.S. 1056 , 119 S.Ct. 621 , 142 L.Ed.2d 560 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mankarious
v.
United States
No. 98-785.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1998.
525 U.S. 1056
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.