Van Wagner v. Henry, 525 U.S. 1120 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Van Wagner v. Henry, 525 U.S. 1120 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Amos v. Md. Dept of Public Safety (ca4, 1999-12-29) · Strongest negative: Little Rock School District v. James Mauney, Mr. And Mrs., Parents of J. M., James Mauney, Mr. And Mrs., Parents of J. M., Third Party v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Department of Education, Third Party (ca3, 1999-08-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Little Rock School District v. James Mauney, Mr. And Mrs., Parents of J. M., James Mauney, Mr. And Mrs., Parents of J. M., Third Party v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Department of Education, Third Party (2×) also: Cited "see"
3rd Cir. · 1999 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Kimel, 139 F.3d at 1426, cert. granted 119 S. Ct. 901 (1999); Humenansky v. Board of Regents, 152 F.3d 822 (8th Cir. 1998).
examined Cited "but see" Little Rock School District v. Mauney (4×) also: Cited "see"
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Kimel, 139 F.3d at 1426, cert. granted - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 901 , 142 L.Ed.2d 901 (1999); Humenansky v. Regents of Univ. of Minnesota, 152 F.3d 822 (8th Cir.1998).
discussed Cited "see" Amos v. Md. Dept of Public Safety
4th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 , 1433 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. granted, 119 S. Ct. 901 (1999); Autio v. AFSCME, Local 3139, 140 F.3d 802, 806 (8th Cir. 1998), vacated, 140 F.3d 802 , reh'g en banc, 157 F.3d 1141 (affirming district court's decision upholding the ADA by an evenly divided vote); Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430, 432 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 58 (1998); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 2340 (1998); and Crawford v. Indiana Dep't of Corrections, 115 F.3d 481, 487 (7th Cir. 1997).
discussed Cited "see" Muller v. Costello
2d Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 , 1433, 1442 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. granted, 119 S. Ct. 901 and cert. granted sub nom United States v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 119 S. Ct. 902 (1999); Coolbaugh, 136 F.3d at 437 (5th Cir. 1998); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267, 1270-71 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 2340 (1988); Crawford v. Indiana Dep't of Corrections, 115 F.3d 481, 487 (7th Cir. 1997).
discussed Cited "see" Muller v. Costello
2d Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 , 1433, 1442 (11th Cir.1998), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 901 , 142 L.Ed.2d 901 and cert. granted sub nom United States v. Florida Bd. of Regents, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 902 , 142 L.Ed.2d 901 (1999); Coolbaugh, 136 F.3d at 437 (5th Cir.1998); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267, 1270-71 (9th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 2340 , 141 L.Ed.2d 711 (1998); Crawford v. Indiana Dep't of Corrections, 115 F.3d 481, 487 (7th Cir.1997).
discussed Cited "see" Alsbrook v. City Of Maumelle
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. granted, 119 S. Ct. 901 , 902 (1999); Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 58 (1998); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" C. B. Alsbrook v. AR Commission on Law
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimel v. Florida Bd.of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 (11th Cir.1998), cert. granted, — U.S. —, —, 119 S.Ct. 901 , 902, 142 L.Ed.2d 901 (1999); Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430 (5th Cir.), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" Elections Board v. Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce (2×)
Wis. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shrink Mo. Gov’t PAC v. Adams, 161 F.3d 519,523 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. granted, 119 S. Ct. 901 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" Amos v. Maryland Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services
4th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 , 1433 (11th Cir.1998), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 901 , 142 L.Ed.2d 901 (1999); Autio v. AFSCME, Local 3139, 140 F.3d 802, 806 (8th Cir.1998), vacated, 140 F.3d 802 , reh’g en banc, 157 F.3d 1141 (affirming district court’s decision upholding the ADA by an evenly divided vote); Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430, 432 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267, 1270 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 2340 , 141 L.Ed.2d 711 (1998); and Crawford v.…
discussed Cited "see" Granville Amos v. Maryland Department Of Public Safety And Correctional Services
4th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 , 1433 (11th Cir.1998), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 901 , 142 L.Ed.2d 901 (1999); Autio v. AFSCME, Local 3139, 140 F.3d 802, 806 (8th Cir.1998), vacated, 140 F.3d 802 , reh'g en banc, 157 F.3d 1141 (affirming district court's decision upholding the ADA by an evenly divided vote); Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430, 432 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267, 1270 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 2340 , 141 L.Ed.2d 711 (1998); and Craw…
cited Cited "see" Torres v. Tourism Co.
1st Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See 119 S. Ct. 901 , 902 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. Moore
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimel v. State of Florida Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 , 1431 (11th Cir. 1998) (“Although we make no definite rule about it, the need to construe one section [of a statute] with another, by its very nature, hints that no unmistakable or unequivocal declaration is present.”), cert. granted, 119 S. Ct. 901 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. Singletary
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimel v. State of Florida Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 , 1431 (11th Cir.1998) (“Although we make no definite rule about it, the need to construe one section [of a statute] with another, by its very nature, hints that no unmistakable or unequivocal declaration is present.”), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 901 , 142 L.Ed.2d 901 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Key v. Grayson
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Kimel v. State Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 , 1433 (11th Cir.1998), cert. granted, — U.S. —, —, 119 S.Ct. 901 , 902, 142 L.Ed.2d 901 (1999); Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267, 1270-71 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 2340 , 141 L.Ed.2d 711 (1998); Crawford v. Indiana Dep’t of Corrections, 115 F.3d 481 (7th Cir.1997). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Key v. Grayson
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Kimel v. State Bd. of Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 , 1433 (11th Cir.1998), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, ----, 119 S.Ct. 901 , 902, 142 L.Ed.2d 901 (1999); Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267, 1270-71 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 2340 , 141 L.Ed.2d 711 (1998); Crawford v. Indiana Dep't of Corrections, 115 F.3d 481 (7th Cir.1997) 2 The relevant state of the law is that which existed at the time of the alleged violation.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Van Wagner
v.
Henry, Warden
No. 98-7311.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1999.
525 U.S. 1120
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until February 16,1999, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.