green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Simpson v. Mayer
See United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428 (8th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 124 (U.S. 1999) (finding warrantless search requirement reasonably related to probation goals of rehabilitation and public protection). b.
discussed
Cited "see"
Armstrong v. AMERICAN PALLET LEASING INC.
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) ("It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief," citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)); accord …
discussed
Cited "see"
Transamerica Life Insurance v. Lincoln National Life Insurance
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848, 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)); accor…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirt v. Fashion Bug 3253, Inc.
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) ("It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)); accor…
discussed
Cited "see"
Torgeson v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Laurrence County, 155 F.3d 1005,1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)); acco…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bunda v. Potter
IA.L.R. 7.1(g); Lorenzen v. GKN Armstrong Wheels, Inc., 345 F.Supp.2d 977 , 992 n. 4 (N.D.Iowa 2004); Baker v. John Morrell & Co., 263 F.Supp.2d 1161 , 1169 n. 1 (N.D.Iowa 2003); see also Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 *1056 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steck v. Francis
L.R. 7.1(g); Lorenzen v. GKN Armstrong Wheels, Inc., 345 F.Supp.2d 977 , 992 n. 4 (N.D.Iowa 2004); Baker v. John Morrell & Co., 263 F.Supp.2d 1161 , 1169 n. 1 (N.D.Iowa 2003); see also Republican Party of Minn. v. *962 Kelly, 247 F.3d 854, 881 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief," citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005 , 1011 (8th Cir.1998);…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republican Party of Minnesota v. Kelly
See, e.g., United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass'n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005 , 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Darden, 70 F.3d 1507 , 1549 n. 18 (8th Cir.1995) ("Absent some reason for failing to [raise issue in opening brief], we will not consider an issue first raised in a reply brief.”). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nason
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 98-9710.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.