Lowenschuss v. Selnick, 120 S. Ct. 185 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Lowenschuss v. Selnick, 120 S. Ct. 185 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Stanton (nvb, 2011-07-19) · Strongest negative: Taunt v. General Retirement System of Detroit (In re Wilcox) (ca6, 2000-11-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Taunt v. General Retirement System of Detroit (In re Wilcox)
6th Cir. · 2000 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see In re Lowenschuss, 171 F.3d 673 , 682 (9th Cir.) (holding that a state anti-alienation provision must contain some “mechanism” for enforcement in order to satisfy § 541(c)(2)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 877 , 120 S.Ct. 185 , 145 L.Ed.2d 156 (1999).
discussed Cited "but see" In Re: Michael Duane Wilcox, Debtor. Charles J. Taunt, Trustee v. General Retirement System of the City of Detroit and Board of Trustees of the General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
6th Cir. · 2000 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see In re Lowenschuss, 171 F.3d 673 , 682 (9th Cir.) (holding that a state anti-alienation provision must contain some "mechanism" for enforcement in order to satisfy §541(c)(2)), cert. denied, 120 S.Ct. 185 (1999). 30 The anti-assignment provision of the Detroit plan is enforceable because it is part of the Detroit City Charter and has the status of any city charter provision 5 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Stanton
Bankr. D. Nev. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Domicile means actual residence coupled with a present intention to remain there. 4 CollieR on BANKRUPTCY ¶ 522.06 (Henry Sommer & Alan Resnick, eds., 16th ed. 2011) (emphasis supplied); see also Lowenschuss v. Selnick (In re Lowenschuss), 171 F.3d 673, 684 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 877 , 120 S.Ct. 185 , 145 L.Ed.2d 156 (1999) (debtor satisfied both *86 physical presence and intent requirements for establishing domicile); Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30, 48 , 109 S.Ct. 1597 , 104 L.Ed.2d 29 (1989) (“For adults, domicile is established by physical p…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Laurance LOWENSCHUSS, Trustee of the Fred Lowenschuss Associates Attorneys at Law Pension and Profit Sharing Plan
v.
Beverly SELNICK
No. 99-187.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
120 S. Ct. 185
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.