Lowenschuss v. Selnick (1999)
green
· 19 citation events
across 13 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
But see In re Lowenschuss, 171 F.3d 673 , 682 (9th Cir.) (holding that a state anti-alienation provision must contain some “mechanism” for enforcement in order to satisfy § 541(c)(2)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 877 , 120 S.Ct. 185 , 145 L.Ed.2d 156 (1999).
yellow
In Re: Michael Duane Wilcox, Debtor. Charles J. Taunt, Trustee v. General Retirement System of the City of De… (2000)
But see In re Lowenschuss, 171 F.3d 673 , 682 (9th Cir.) (holding that a state anti-alienation provision must contain some "mechanism" for enforcement in order to satisfy §541(c)(2)), cert. denied, 120 S.Ct. 185 (1999). 30 The anti-assignment provision of the Detroit plan is enforceable because it is part of the Detroit City Charter and has the status of any city charter provision 5 .
green
In Re Stanton (2011)
Domicile means actual residence coupled with a present intention to remain there. 4 CollieR on BANKRUPTCY ¶ 522.06 (Henry Sommer & Alan Resnick, eds., 16th ed. 2011) (emphasis supplied); see also Lowenschuss v. Selnick (In re Lowenschuss), 171 F.3d 673, 684 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 877 , 120 S.Ct. 185 , 145 L.Ed.2d 156 (1999) (debtor satisfied both *86 physical presence and intent requirements for establishing domicile); Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. H…
debtor satisfied both *86 physical presence and intent requirements for establishing domicile