green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto Sanchez
(2×)
See United States v. Candelario, 240 F.3d 1300, 1306 (11th Cir.) ("If the defendant either does not raise the constitutional objection or does not raise it in a timely fashion, he is entitled only to plain error review."), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 2535 (2001). 69 In United States v. Gerrow, 232 F.3d 831 (11th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, ___ S. Ct. ___, No. 00-9373 (Oct. 1, 2001), we addressed a similar challenge and concluded that the district court did not commit plain error in imposing a supervised release term of five years.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cernobyl
See United *1219 States v. Candelario, 240 F.3d 1300 , 1311 n. 16 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 2535 , 150 L.Ed.2d 705 (2001); United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000) (“We see nothing in the Supreme Court decision in Ap-prendi which would permit us to conclude that 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a) and (b) ... are unconstitutional on their face.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 2015 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1015 (2001); United States v. Strachan, Nos. 99-4119, 99-4426, 2001 WL 208470 , at *5 n. * (4th Cir. Mar.2, 2001) (unpublished).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago Gilberto Sanchez
See United States v. Candelario, 240 F.3d 1300, 1306 (11th Cir.) (“If the defendant either does not raise the constitutional objection or does not raise it in a timely fashion, he is entitled only to plain error review.”), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 2535 (2001). 69 In United States v. Gerrow, 232 F.3d 831 (11th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, ___ S. Ct. ___, No. 00-9373 (Oct. 1, 2001), we addressed a similar challenge and concluded that the district court did not commit plain error in imposing a supervised release term of five years.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez
See United States v. Candelario, 240 F.3d 1300, 1306 (11th Cir.) (“If the defendant either does not raise the constitutional objection or does not raise it in a timely fashion, he is entitled only to plain error review.”), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 2535 (2001). 69 In United States v. Gerrow, 232 F.3d 831 (11th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, ___ S. Ct. ___, No. 00-9373 (Oct. 1, 2001), we addressed a similar challenge and concluded that the district court did not commit plain error in imposing a supervised release term of five years.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Montel Lavelle Humphrey
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Candelario, 240 F.3d 1300, 1304 (11th Cir.2001) (stating that “[a] defendant’s objection to the quantity of drugs that the Government attributes to him is not, on its own, a constitutional objection”), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 922 , 121 S.Ct. 2535 , 150 L.Ed.2d 705 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leroy S. Outen Rodney D. Smith Sheldon Wilford Donald Gordon Euton Christian Tyrone McFadden Herbie Noel, AKA \Wayne\""
See United States v. Collazo-Aponte, 281 F.3d 320, 324-25 (1st Cir.2002); United States v. Buckland, 277 F.3d 1173, 1178-83 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc); United States v. Kelly, 272 F.3d 622 (3d Cir.2001); United States v. McAllister, 272 F.3d 228, 232-33 (4th Cir.2001); United States v. Cernobyl, 255 F.3d 1215, 1218-19 (10th Cir.2001); United States v. Martinez, 253 F.3d 251 , 256 n. 6 (6th Cir.2001); United States v. Brough, 243 F.3d 1078, 1080 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 203 , 151 L.Ed.2d 144 (2001); United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000), ce rt. de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rivera-Melendez
"How statutes are . . . implemented [] to fulfil that requirement is a subject to which the Constitution does not speak." United States v. Brough, 243 F.3d 1078, 1079 (7th Cir. 2001); see also United States v. Candelario, 240 F.3d 1300 , 1311 n.16 (11th Cir. 2001) (characterizing as "without merit" a facial challenge to §§ 841 and 846 under Apprendi), cert. denied, --- U.S. --- , 121 S. Ct. 2535 (2001); United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580 , 582 (5th Cir. 2000) (stating that "[w]e see nothing in the Supreme Court decision in Apprendi which would permit us to conclude that 21 U.S.C. §§ …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rafael Collazo-Aponte
“How statutes are ... implemented [ ] to fulfil that requirement is a subject to which the Constitution does not speak.” United States v. Brough, 243 F.3d 1078, 1079 (7th Cir.2001); see also United States v. Candelario, 240 F.3d 1300 , 1311 n. 16 (11th Cir.2001) (characterizing as “without merit” a facial challenge to §§ 841 and 846 under Apprendi), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 922 , 121 S.Ct. 2535 , 150 L.Ed.2d 705 (2001); United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000) (stating that “[w]e see nothing in the Supreme Court decision in Apprendi which would permit us to conclu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Santiago-Vazquez
United States v. Berdecia, 143 F.Supp.2d at 191 -192 (quoting United States v. Brough, 243 F.3d at 1079 ); see also United States v. Candelario, 240 F.3d 1300 , 1311 n. 16 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 922 , 121 S.Ct. 2535 , 150 L.Ed.2d 705 (2001); United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1045 , 121 S.Ct. 2015 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1015 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Candelario
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 00-9956.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 2001.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.