discussed Cited "see" United States v. Zayac The question is not whether this Court believes that the evidence at trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but rather, whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted; emphasis in original); accord United States v. Howard, 214 F.3d 361, 363 (2d Cir.) (“[We] resolve all inferences from the evidence and issues of credibility in favor of the verdict.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 909 , 121 S.Ct. 258 , 148 L.Ed.2d 187 (2000).

discussed Cited "see" United States. v. Zayac The question is not whether this Court believes that the evidence at 6 11‐4900 United States. v. Zayac trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but rather, whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.ʺ Id. (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted; emphasis in original); accord United States v. Howard, 214 F.3d 361, 363 (2d Cir.) (ʺ[We] resolve all inferences from the evidence and issues of credibility in favor of the verdict.ʺ), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 909 (2000).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Gomez See United States v. Alicea, 205 F.3d 480, 482-83 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 909 , 121 S.Ct. 256 , 148 L.Ed.2d 185 (2000).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Masiarczyk See United States v. Ferguson, 211 F.3d 878, 886 (5th Cir.2000) (reviewing allegation of constitutional error for plain error because Ferguson did not raise the issue below), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 909 , 121 S.Ct. 258 , 148 L.Ed.2d 187 (Oct. 2, 2000); United States v. Means, 133 F.3d 444, 447 (6th Cir. 1998) ("The defendant raises a constitutional challenge to his conviction, which, as a question of law, we generally would review de novo.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jacob Harrison, Jr., United States of America v. Casey Seon Burnett (2×) See, e.g., United States v. Alicea, 205 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 909 (2000) (holding that high speed chase and shots fired at pursuing officers separately endangered police and public); see also United States v. Rodriguez-Matos, 188 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 (2000); United States v. Miner, 108 F.3d 967 (8th Cir. 1997); United States v. Alexander, 48 F.3d 1477 (9th Cir. 1995); United States v. Swoape, 31 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 1994).