green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foretich, Doris v. United States
(2×)
Moreover, the selectivity or scope of a statute may indicate punitiveness where the differential treatment of the affected party or parties cannot be explained "without resort to inferences of punitive purpose." BellSouth I, 144 F.3d at 67 ; see also Navegar, Inc. v. United States, 192 F.3d 1050, 1067 (D.C.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 816 , 121 S.Ct. 53 , 148 L.Ed.2d 21 (2000) (holding that the breadth of a challenged statute indicated that Congress "was aiming not to punish appellants, but rather to regulate an entire class"); BellSouth II, 162 F.3d at 690 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
West
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 99-1869.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.