green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Healy v. Spencer
See Hurtado v. Tucker, 245 F.3d 7, 17 (1st Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 925 , 122 S.Ct. 282 , 151 L.Ed.2d 208 (2001) (noting that the Terry Williams Court found the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision objectively unreasonable based upon its “failure éven to mention the defendant’s sole argument in mitigation”).
cited
Cited "see"
O'BRIEN v. Marshall
See Hurtado v. Tucker, 245 F.3d 7, 15-16 (1st Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 925 , 122 S.Ct. 282 , 151 L.Ed.2d 208 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grim v. State
(2×)
See LaMarca v. State, 785 So.2d 1209 (Fla.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 925 , 122 S.Ct. 281 , 151 L.Ed.2d 207 (2001) (holding that the trial court properly declined to evaluate proffered mitigation evidence during sentencing because the defendant had waived the presentation of mitigating evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sok v. Spencer
Sok complains at length that the Appeals Court's analysis was inadequate because it "did not engage in any independent analysis of what took place at the Motion to Suppress hearing.” (#21 at 20) However, in determining whether a state court's application of federal law was "unreasonable,” a habeas court “do[es] not focus on the quality of the court's reasoning but rather on the reasonableness of the outcome." Ellen v. Brady, 475 F.3d 5, 9 (1st Cir.2007); see also Hurtado v. Tucker, 245 F.3d 7, 20 (1st Cir.) ("The ultimate question on habeas ... is not how well reasoned the state court de…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shewfelt
v.
Alaska
v.
Alaska
No. 01-5466.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2001.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.