cited Cited "see, e.g." Perkins v. Commonwealth See e.g., State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756 , 47 P.3d 783, 796 (2002), cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 , 123 S.Ct. 444 , 154 L.Ed.2d 341 (2002).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Andrews (2×) State v. Rudy B., 149 N.M. 22 , 243 P.3d 726 (2010) (.Apprendi does not apply to the evidentia-ry hearing to determine whether a juvenile adjudicate as a youthful offender should be sentenced as a juvenile or as an adult); see also State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756 , 47 P.3d 783, 798 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 980 , 123 S.Ct. 444 , 154 L.Ed.2d 341 (2002) (Apprendi does not apply to juvenile waiver hearings because they only determine “which system will be appropriate for a juvenile offender.”); Gonzales v. Tafoya, 515 F.3d 1097, 1112 (10th Cir.2008), ce rt. denied,, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 21…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Caldwell v. Commonwealth (2×) See e.g., State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756 , 47 P.3d 783, 796 (2002), cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 , 123 S.Ct. 444 , 154 L.Ed.2d 341 (2002).