green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Britt
See State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756, 783 , 47 P.3d 783 , cert, denied 537 U.S. 980 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Perez
See State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756, 770 , 47 P.3d 783 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Perez
See State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756, 770 , 47 P.3d 783 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756, 757 , 47 P.3d 783 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 (2002) (Jones I).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tyler
See State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756, 770 , 47 P.3d 783 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Paredes
See State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756, 785 , 47 P.3d 783 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 (2002) (record on appeal is sufficiently complete); State v. Jenkins, 257 Kan. 1074, 1079-80 , 898 P.2d 1121 (1995) (conflict of interest claim considered when all facts are contained in record).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Harris
See State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756, 782 , 47 P.3d 783 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 (2002).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Colon
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Robinson , 477 Mass. 1008 , 1008, 75 N.E.3d 1112 (2017), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 980 , 123 S.Ct. 446 , 154 L.Ed.2d 341 (2018).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Perkins v. Commonwealth
See e.g., State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756 , 47 P.3d 783, 796 (2002), cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 , 123 S.Ct. 444 , 154 L.Ed.2d 341 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garr v. WARDEN, DAYTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Moreover, the Jackson standard “must be applied with explicit reference to the substantive elements of the criminal offense as defined by state law.” Jackson, 443 U.S. at 324 n. 16, 99 S.Ct. 2781 (emphasis added); see also Sanford v. Yukins, 288 F.3d 855, 860 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 980 , 123 S.Ct. 445 , 154 L.Ed.2d 342 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Andrews
(2×)
State v. Rudy B., 149 N.M. 22 , 243 P.3d 726 (2010) (.Apprendi does not apply to the evidentia-ry hearing to determine whether a juvenile adjudicate as a youthful offender should be sentenced as a juvenile or as an adult); see also State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756 , 47 P.3d 783, 798 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 980 , 123 S.Ct. 444 , 154 L.Ed.2d 341 (2002) (Apprendi does not apply to juvenile waiver hearings because they only determine “which system will be appropriate for a juvenile offender.”); Gonzales v. Tafoya, 515 F.3d 1097, 1112 (10th Cir.2008), ce rt. denied,, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 21…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laymon v. State
(2×)
See e.g., State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756 , Syl. ¶ 3, 47 P.3d 783 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 (2002); State v. Carter, 270 Kan. 426, 433 , 14 P.3d 1138 (2000) (remand for hearing serves no purpose when record adequate to decide ineffective assistance issue).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Caldwell v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See e.g., State v. Jones, 273 Kan. 756 , 47 P.3d 783, 796 (2002), cert. denied 537 U.S. 980 , 123 S.Ct. 444 , 154 L.Ed.2d 341 (2002).
Crawford
v.
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
v.
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
02-6137.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 2002.
Published
CRAWFORD
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 02-6137.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 21, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.