green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“[I]n Title VII cases, the existence of an employer-employee relationship is a question of federal law____”
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Murphy-Taylor v. Hofmann
n title vii cases, the existence of an employer-employee relationship is a question of federal law____
discussed
Cited "see"
Law v. Hunt County
(2×)
See Mitchell v. Chapman, 343 F.3d 811, 833 (6th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S.Ct. 2908 , 159 L.Ed.2d 813 (2004); Wascura v. Carver, 169 F.3d 683 , 686 (11th Cir.1999); cf. Darby v. Bratch, 287 F.3d 673 , 681 (8th Cir.2002) (holding that a public official may be held liable in his or her individual capacity for retaliation in violation of the FMLA).
cited
Cited "see"
Strich v. United States
See Davis v. United States, 343 F.3d 1282, 1296 (10th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S.Ct. 2907 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
IMTEC Corp. v. Moore
See Davis v. United States, 192 F.3d 951, 957 (10th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S.Ct. 2907 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
McDonald v. Checks-N-Advance, Inc. (In Re Ferrell)
(2×)
See Baker v. Sunny Chevrolet, Inc., 349 F.3d 862, 867-68 (6th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S.Ct. 2908 , 159 L.Ed.2d 813 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Burgess v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.
See Ysbrand v. Daimlerchrysler Corp., 2003 OK 17, ¶ 21 , 81 P.3d 618, 627 , cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S.Ct. 2907 , 159 L.Ed.2d 812 (2004) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley Williams v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
(2×)
See Miller-El v. Dretke, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2908 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004) (NO. 03-9659). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Woodford
See Miller-El v. Dretke, 124 S. Ct. 2908 , 72 USLW 3761 , 72 USLW 3768 (U.S. Jun. 28, 2004) (NO. 03-9659). 1328 WILLIAMS v. WOODFORD by the parties, and exercised 3 out of 22 (14%) of his peremp- tory challenges against African-Americans.
cited
Cited "see"
Mobassa Boyd v. Anthony C. Newland, Warden
See Miller-El v. Dretke, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2908 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004) (granting petition for certiorari). 5 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
RIPP v. OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
See, e.g. , Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp ., 2003 OK 17, ¶ 6 , 81 P.3d 618 , cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S. Ct. 2907 (2004); Houck v. Farmers Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
RIPP v. OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
See, e.g. , Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp ., 2003 OK 17 81 P.3d 618 cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S. Ct. 2907 (2004); Houck v. Farmers Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
RIPP v. OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
See, e.g. , Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp ., , ¶ 6, , cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S. Ct. 2907 (2004); Houck v. Farmers Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
RIPP v. OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
See, e.g. , Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp ., 2003 OK 17 81 P.3d 618 cert. denied, 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S. Ct. 2907 (2004); Houck v. Farmers Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rasic v. City of Northlake
(2×)
Compare Modica v. Taylor, 465 F.3d 174, 186 (5th Cir.2006) (holding that public employees may be held individually liable under FMLA) and Darby v. Bratch, 287 F.3d 673 , 681 (8th Cir.2002) (same) with Wascura v. Carver, 169 F.3d 683 , 685-7 (11th Cir.1999) (holding that there is no individual liability for public employees under FMLA) and Mitchell v. Chapman, 343 F.3d 811, 829-30 (6th Cir.2003), cert. denied 542 U.S. 937 , 124 S.Ct. 2908 , 159 L.Ed.2d 813 (2004) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sheaffer v. County of Chatham
See, e.g., Mitchell v. Chapman, 343 F.3d 811, 832 (6th Cir.2003) (concluding, based on a textual analysis, that public employees cannot be held individually liable under the FMLA), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2908 , — L.Ed.2d-(2004); Wascura v. Carver, 169 F.3d 683 , 686 (11th Cir.1999) (applying Fair Labor Standards Act jurisprudence to conclude that no claim under the FMLA could be maintained against public officials); Keene v. Rinaldi, 127 F.Supp.2d 770, 778-79 (M.D.N.C.2000) (concluding that public officials may not be sued as employers under the FMLA).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baker
v.
Sunny Chevrolet, Inc., Dba Wayland Chevrolet
v.
Sunny Chevrolet, Inc., Dba Wayland Chevrolet
03-1369.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2004.
Published
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1)
BAKER ET AL.
v.
SUNNY CHEVROLET, INC., DBA WAYLAND CHEVROLET.
No. 03-1369.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 28, 2004.
1
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 349 F. 3d 862.