green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Connecticut Bar Ass'n v. United States
As with a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), “the court must take all facts alleged in the complaint as true and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of [the] plaintiff.” Raila v. United States, 355 F.3d 118, 119 (2d Cir.2004); see Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A., 318 F.3d 113, 128 (2d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 , 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 (2003) (noting that “[t]he standards for dismissal under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) are substantially identical”).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits. Com, Inc.
(2×)
See Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A., 318 F.3d 113, 120 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 , 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Lerner v. Fleet Bank
See Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A. ( Lerner I ), 318 F.3d 113 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 , 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
OSRecovery, Inc. v. One Groupe International, Inc.
De Falco v. Bernas, 244 F.3d 286, 305 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 891 , 122 S.Ct. 207 , 151 L.Ed.2d 147 (2001) (quoting Pinnacle Consultants, Ltd. v. Leucadia Nat’l Corp., 101 F.3d 900, 904 (2d Cir.1996)); accord Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A., 318 F.3d 113, 120 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 , 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 (2003). 60 .
cited
Cited "see"
Chester E. Stogsdill v. Healthmark Partners
See Advocat, Inc. v. Sauer, 111 S.W.3d 346, 357-58 (Ark.), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 532 and 124 S. Ct. 535 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
CHESTER EARL STOGSDILL BRENDA HINES, — v. HEALTHMARK PARTNERS, L.L.C., —
See Advocat, Inc. v. Sauer, 353 Ark. 29 , 111 S.W.3d 346, 357-58 (Ark.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 and — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 535 , 157 L.Ed.2d 409 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rothstein v. UBS AG
In conducting this review, we ... construe plaintiffs’ complaint liberally, accepting all factual allegations in the complaint as true, and drawing all reasonable inferences in plaintiffs’ favor.” Selevan v. New York Thruway Authority, 584 F.3d at 88 (internal quotation marks omitted); see, e.g., Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A., 318 F.3d 113, 117 (2d Cir.) (“Lerner”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 , 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carnell v. Arkansas Elder Outreach of Little Rock, Inc.
See also Advocat, Inc. v. Sauer, 353 Ark. 29, 51-52 , 111 S.W.3d 346, 358-59 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 , 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 (2003), where there was clear testimony by Advocat’s former chief financial officer that a parent corporation and two subsidiaries were operated as one business.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arkansas Elder Outreach of Little Rock, Inc. v. Thompson
See also Advocat, Inc. v. Sauer, 353 Ark. 29, 51-52 , 111 S.W.3d 346, 358-59 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 , 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 (2003), where there was clear testimony by Advocat’s former chief financial officer that a parent corporation and two subsidiaries were operated as one business.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watkins v. Arkansas Elder Outreach of Little Rock, Inc.
See also Advocat, Inc. v. Sauer, 353 Ark. 29, 51-52 , 111 S.W.3d 346, 358-59 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 , 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 (2003), where there was clear testimony by Advocat's former chief financial officer that a parent corporation and two subsidiaries were operated as one business. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boison v. Insurance Services Office, Inc.
“Unlike Article III standing, which ordinarily should be determined before reaching the merits ... statutory standing may be assumed for the purposes of deciding whether the plaintiff otherwise has a viable cause of action.” Coan v. Kaufman, 457 F.3d 250, 256 (2d Cir.2006) (citation omitted); see also Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A., 318 F.3d 113, 127 (2d Cir.2003) (“[C]ourts may determine whether a cause of action exists under a given statute, an issue of statutory construction that goes to the merits of the action, before addressing ... statutory standing.”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coan v. Kaufman
Passengers, 414 U.S. 453 , 94 S.Ct. 690 , 38 L.Ed.2d 646 (1974)); see also Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A., 318 F.3d 113, 127 (2d Cir.) (“[Cjourts may determine whether a cause of action exists under a given statute, an issue of statutory construction that goes to the merits of the action, before addressing ... statutory standing.”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1012 , 124 S.Ct. 532 , 157 L.Ed.2d 424 (2003). 3 Because we agree with the district court that Coan’s suit should be dismissed irrespective of whether she is a “participant” under ERISA, we too will assume rather than decide that she is…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lerner Et Al.
v.
Fleet Bank Et Al.
v.
Fleet Bank Et Al.
03-189.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 2003.
Breyer.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Breyer took no part in the[*1013] consideration or decision of this petition.