green
Positive treatment
7.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pflum
See United States v. May, 413 F.3d 841, 849 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1024 , 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pelum
See United States v. May, 413 F.3d 841, 849 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1024 , 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tejeda-Fuentes
See United States v. LopezUrbina, 434 F.3d 750, 765 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1024 , 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard A. Oslund
See United States v. May, 413 F.3d 841, 849 (8th Cir.) (finding "persuasive" the view of other circuits that have determined that Apprendi, Blakely, and Booker do not affect the determination of restitution amounts), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 672 (2005); -19- see also United States v. Miller, 419 F.3d 791, 792-93 (8th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1379 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Ashton Oslund
See United States v. May, 413 F.3d 841, 849 (8th Cir.) (finding “persuasive” the view of other circuits that have determined that Apprendi, Blakely, and Booker do not affect the determination of restitution amounts), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005); see also United States v. Miller, 419 F.3d 791, 792-93 (8th Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1379 , 164 L.Ed.2d 85 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian Fay Jeremiah
See United States v. May, 413 F.3d 841, 844 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian Jeremiah
See United States v. May, 413 F.3d 841, 844 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 672 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wise
See United States v. Lopez-Urbina, 434 F.3d 750, 762 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005); United States v. Tolbert, 306 F.3d 244, 246 (5th Cir.2002) (“The decision whether to group offenses is a question of law we review de novo.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abdallah
When the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, “the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); see also United States v. Lopez-Urbina, 434 F.3d 750, 757 (5th Cir.) (applying Jackson), c e rt. denied, 546 U.S. 1024 , 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Uvalle-Patricio
See also United States v. Lopez-Urbina, 434 F.3d 750, 757 (5th Cir.) (applying Jackson), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Boston
See also United States v. Lopez-Urbina, 434 F.3d 750, 757 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rojas Alvarez
See also United States v. Lopez-Urbina, 434 F.3d 750, 757 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Villalona
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 05-7039.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 2005.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.