Clarion River Power Co. v. Smith, 287 U.S. 639 (1932). · Go Syfert
Search
Clarion River Power Co. v. Smith, 287 U.S. 639 (1932). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the statute may be satisfied by a signed writing not made as a memorandum of a contract”
9 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Harold R. Farrow v. Robert v. Cahill and Joel R. Kaswell (cadc, 1980-12-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Harold R. Farrow v. Robert v. Cahill and Joel R. Kaswell
D.C. Cir. · 1980 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the statute may be satisfied by a signed writing not made as a memorandum of a contract
cited Cited "see" Financial General Bankshares, Inc. v. Metzger
D.D.C. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
D.C.Code Ann. § 41-314 (1973); see Philips v. United States, 59 F.2d 881, 887 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 639 , 53 S.Ct. 88 , 77 L.Ed. 553 (1932).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clarion River Power Co.
v.
Smith
No. 325.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1932.
287 U.S. 639
Messrs. Robert F. Cogswell, Wm. Marshall Bullitt, and C. Edward Paxson for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Richardson, and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold for respondents.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.