Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp., 305 U.S. 580 (1938). · Go Syfert
Search
Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp., 305 U.S. 580 (1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Estate of Grund v. Grund (indctapp, 1995-03-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1930 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1930 1978 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Estate of Grund v. Grund
Ind. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lilly v. Smith (1938) 7th Cir., 96 F.2d 341 , cert. denied, (1938) 305 U.S. 604 , 59 S.Ct. 64 , 83 L.Ed. 383 ; State of Indiana, Indiana Department of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Division, supra, 177 Ind.App. 632 , 380 N.E.2d 1279 ; Johnson v. Hicks (1952) 231 Ind. 353 , 108 N.E.2d 129 . 15 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works
v.
Nu-Enamel Corp.
No. 51.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1938.
305 U.S. 580
Messrs. George A. Carpenter and George I. Haight for petitioner., Mr. Edward S. Rogers for respondents.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted.