Hanna Furnace Corp. v. United States, 323 U.S. 667 (1944). · Go Syfert
Search
Hanna Furnace Corp. v. United States, 323 U.S. 667 (1944). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. v. United States (ilnd, 1968-10-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944 1985 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. v. United States
N.D. Ill. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carolina Scenic Coach Lines v. United States, 56 F.Supp. 801 (W.D.N.C.1944), aff’d 323 U.S. 678 , 65 S.Ct. 277 , 89 L.Ed. 550 (1944), and North Coast Transportation Co. v. United States, 54 F.Supp. 448 (N.D.Cal.1944), aff’d 323 U.S. 668 , 65 S.Ct. 62 , 89 L.Ed. 543 (1944), reh. den. 323 U.S. 814 , 65 S.Ct. 114 , 89 L.Ed. 647 (1944).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hanna Furnace Corp.
v.
United States
No. 132.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1944.
323 U.S. 667
Messrs. Ralph Ulsh, Harry D. Femke, and James McEvoy, Jr. for appellant., Solicitor General , Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al., appellees.
Cited by 14 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Pan American Corp., 304 U. S. 156, 158; United States v. Wabash R. Co., 321 U. S. 403.

Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al., appellees.