green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wright Contracting Co.
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986-87 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karl Lee Phillips v. United States
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 71 (1950); United States v. Buechler, 557 F.2d 1002 (3d Cir. 1977); 2 United States v. Follette, 32 F.Supp. 953 (E.D.Pa.1940).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald L. Vaughn
(2×)
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986-87 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950). 3 Here, the condition falls within one of the enumerated types.
cited
Cited "see"
Morrissey v. Curran
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950).” d.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred Ferrara and Arthur Russell
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950).
cited
Cited "see"
Morpul, Inc. v. Glen Raven Knitting Mill, Inc.
See Smith v. Florence-Mayo Nuway Co., 182 F.2d 507 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950); Smith v. General Foundry Mach.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stoehr
See Karrell v. United States, 9 Cir., 1950, 181 F.2d 981, 986 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 ; United States v. Follette, D.C.Pa.1940, 32 F.Supp. 953 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Claimant-Appellee v. Leif D. Soderling, in Re Paul B. Andrew, C.P.M., Receiver. United States of America Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif Soderling, (Three Cases) United States of America v. Jay S. Soderling, (Four Cases) United States of America v. Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif Soderling
Compare Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986 (9th Cir.) (restitution under FPA is limited to losses sustained by the victim as a result of the offense for which the defendant was convicted), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950), with Hughey, 495 U.S. at 420 , 110 S.Ct. at 1984 (restitution under VWPA limited to loss caused by the conduct underlying the offense of conviction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Soderling
Compare Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986 (9th Cir.) (restitution under FPA is limited to losses sustained by the victim as a result of the offense for which the defendant was convicted), cer t. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950), with Hughey, 495 U.S. at 420 , 110 S.Ct. at 1984 (restitution under VWPA limited to loss caused by the conduct underlying the offense of conviction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bausch
The federal probation statute, 18 U.S.C.A. §' 3651, permits “restitution or reparation to aggrieved parties for actual damages or loss caused by the offense for which . . . the defendant is convicted either after a trial or a plea of guilty.” United States v. Tiler, 602 F.2d 30, 33 (2 Cir. 1979); see, e. g., Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986-987 (9 Cir. 1950), cert. den. 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950); United States v. Taylor, 305 F.2d 183, 187 (4 Cir. 1962), cert. den. 371 U.S. 894 , 83 S.Ct. 193 , 9 L.Ed.2d 126 (1962), reh’g den. 371 U.S. 943 , 83 S.Ct. 32…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bong Shew Cheung
See, e. g., Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 [ 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 ] (1950).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herman L. Taylor
See, e. g., Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950), (case remanded for modification of probation order when part of such order declared invalid).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kamen
v.
Gray, Sheriff
v.
Gray, Sheriff
No. 339.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 1950.
Mark H. Adams for petitioner. Harold R. Fatzer, Attorney General of Kansas, C. Harold Hughes, Assistant Attorney General, and John F. Eberhardt for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
[*890] Supreme Court of Kansas. Certiorari denied.