green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
National Surety Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Charles Carter & Company, Inc., Defendant-Third Party Cross-Appellant v. Maryland Casualty Co., Third Party Cross-Appellee
See Briggs v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 334 U.S. at 306 , 68 S.Ct. at 1040 , (postjudgment interest); Lee v. Terminal Transport Co., 301 F.2d 234, 235-36 (7th Cir. 1962) (postjudgment interest); but see Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oldland, 187 F.2d 780, 782 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 816 , 72 S.Ct. 30 , 96 L.Ed. 617 (1951) (where prejudgment interest neither claimed in original suit nor considered on first appeal, mandate did not preclude allowance of interest on remand). 8 This Court retains jurisdiction over its previous mandate in this case and is empowered to recall or reform it to pre…
discussed
Cited "but see"
National Surety Corp. v. Charles Carter & Co.
See Briggs v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 334 U.S. at 306 , 68 S.Ct. at 1040 , (postjudgment interest); Lee v. Terminal Transport Co., 301 F.2d 234, 235-36 (7th Cir. 1962) (post-judgment interest); but see Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oldland, 187 F.2d 780, 782 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 816 , 72 S.Ct. 30 , 96 L.Ed. 617 (1951) (where prejudgment interest neither claimed in original suit nor considered on first appeal, mandate did not preclude allowance of interest on remand).
cited
Cited "see"
Commercial State Bank of Roseville v. Gidney
See North Arlington National Bank v. Kearny Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 3 Cir., 1951, 187 F.2d 564 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 816 , 72 S.Ct. 30 , 96 L.Ed. 617 ; United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 1104, Communications Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e. g., Union Starch & Refining Co. v. NLRB, 186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 815 , 72 S.Ct. 30 , 96 L.Ed. 617 (1951).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 1104, Communications Workers Of America, Afl-Cio, v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e. g., Union Starch & Refining Co. v. NLRB, 186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 815 , 72 S.Ct. 30 , 96 L.Ed. 617 (1951).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waite v. Holmes
(2×)
Compare North Arlington National Bank v. Kearny Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 3 Cir., 1951, 187 F. (2d) 564, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 816 , 72 S.Ct. 30 , 96 L.Ed. 617 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Latvian State Cargo & Passenger Steamship Line
v.
McGrath, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
v.
McGrath, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
No. 65.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1951.
Horace S. Whitman and Charles .Recht for petitioner., Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baynton, George B. Searls and Joseph Lgufer for respondent.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia'Circuit. Certiorari denied.