green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Criticized
Charles E. Helton v. National Labor Relations Board
See Roadway Express, Inc., supra note 19 (ruling that PROD membership and literature are protected by § 7 of the Act); Transcon Lines, supra note 19 (same); cf. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc., 88 NLRB 75 (1950), enforced, 189 F.2d 756 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 919 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 687 (1951) (employee criticism of bargaining position adopted by union is protected by § 7). 32 .
cited
Cited "see"
John G. & Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation v. Dewhurst
See Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191, 196 (5th Cir.), on rehearing, 191 F.2d 705 (1951), cert, denied, 342 U.S. 920 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Sacramento Valley Chapter v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
See Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew’s, Inc., 193 F.2d 51 (9th Cir.1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 919 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an Individual
See Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew’s, Inc., 193 F.2d 51 , 54 — 55 (9th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 919 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Ingram v. State
See Barshop v. United States, 192 F.2d 699 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. den. 342 U.S. 920 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 688 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
McClain v. State
See Barshop v. United States, 192 F.2d 699 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. den. 342 U.S. 920 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 688 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Carl H. Hill v. United States
See Barshop v. United States, 192 F.2d 699 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. den., 342 U.S. 920 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 688 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
South Carolina Council of Milk Producers, Incorporated v. Joseph T. Newton, Jr.
See Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew’s Inc., 193 F.2d 51 (9 Cir. 1951), cert. den., 342 U.S. 919 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952); Karseal Corp. v. Richfield Oil Corp., 221 F.2d 358 (9 Cir. 1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
Butler v. Sadler
See Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191 (C.A. 5th 1951) on rehearing 19. 1 F.2d 705 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952); Giles v. Basore, 154 Tex. 366 , 278 S.W.2d 830 (1955); Lorino v. Crawford Packing Co., 142 Tex. 51 , 175 S.W.2d 410 (1943); Fitzgerald v. Boyles, 66 S.W.2d 347 (Tex.Civ.App.1931) writ. dism.; State v. Balli, 144 Tex. 195 , 190 S.W.2d 71 (1944); City of Victoria v. Schott, 29 S.W. 681, 682 (Tex.Civ.App.1895) no writ, 8 Baylor Law Review, 359, 363.
cited
Cited "see"
Matthew Britt Porter v. United States
See Barshop v. United States, 5th Cir. 1951, 191 F.2d 286 , reh. den. 192 F.2d 699 , cert. den. 342 U.S. 920 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 688 .
cited
Cited "see"
Coates v. Union Oil Co. of California
See Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 5.Cir., 1951, 191 F.2d 705 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 920 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nassau County Ass'n of Insurance Agents, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See also Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew’s Inc., 193 F.2d 51, 53 (9th Cir. 1951), cert. denied 342 U.S. 919 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952) (claiming, inter alia, that defendants’ acts would destroy conference of labor unions; “damage the appellants suffered . . . was incidental to the accomplishment of [defendants’ alleged] illegal object.” 193 F.2d at 54 .) Judge Mansfield, in Cordova, specifically rejected the argument, made in detail here, that eases allowing suits based on constitutional claims could cure the defect created by the language of the antitrust laws. 321 F.S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billy Baxter, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company and Cana Da Dry Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew's Inc., 193 F.2d 51 (9 Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 919 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952); Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp., 30 F.Supp. 389 (S.D.N.Y.1939), aff'd, 113 F.2d 114 (2 Cir. 1940).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. American Can Co.
See also Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew’s Inc., 9 Cir., 1951, 193 F.2d 51 , 54 and 55, cer-tiorari denied 1952, 342 U.S. 919 , 72 S.Ct. 367 , 96 L.Ed. 687 ; Beegle v. Thomson, 7 Cir., 1943, 138 F.2d 875, 881 . *536 Furthermore, nowhere does Rogers seek relief for himself as an individual stockholder.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barshop
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 482.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 28, 1952.
Sylvan Lang, Bernard Ladon, Leslie Byrd and Dan Moody for petitioner., Solicitor General Perlman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack, Meyer Rothwacks and Fred G. Folsom for the United States.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.