green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Hiss
See Judge Goddard’s comments made in denying the motion for a new trial in United States v. Hiss, 107 F.Supp. 128, 134 (S.D.N.Y.1952), affd, 201 F.2d 372 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 942 , 73 S.Ct. 830 , 97 L.Ed. 1368 (1953). 51 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Miller
(2×)
See United States v. Zborowski, 271 F.2d 661, 667 (2 Cir. 1959). ■ The issue here differs since the request is for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. 12 We have noted, Kyle v. United States, 297 F.2d 507, 512 (2 Cir. 1961), the two classical formulations of the criterion — whether the new evidence “is so material that it would probably produce a different verdict, if the new trial were granted,” Berry v. State, 10 Ga. 511, 527 (1851), and whether it might have produced a different verdict, Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82, 87 (7 Cir. 1928)— a test that has b…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Costello
See United States v. Hiss, D.C., 107 F.Supp. 128 , affirmed, 2 Cir., 201 F.2d 372 , certiorari denied 345 U.S. 942 , 73 S.Ct. 830 , 97 L.Ed. 1368 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis J. Hughes v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee
United States v. Hiss, 185 F.2d 822 (2d Cir.1950), cert. denied 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 (1951); see also United States v. Hiss, 107 F.Supp. 128 (S.D.N.Y.1952), aff'd per curiam, 201 F.2d 372 (2d Cir.1953), cert. denied 345 U.S. 942 , 73 S.Ct. 830 , 97 L.Ed. 1368 (1953).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William W. Saunders and Gertrude H. Saunders v. United States
Compare Holt v. CIR, 303 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1982) with CIR v. Golonsky 16 T.C. 1450 , aff’d 200 F.2d 72 (3rd Cir. 1952), cert, denied 345 U.S. 939 , 73 S.Ct. 830 , 97 L.Ed. 1366 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wynne
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 626.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 1953.
Mark H. Johnson for petitioner., Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott and Cecelia H. Goetz for respondent.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.