green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Poole v. State
But the statute cannot reach him beyond the confines of the state, and we are not prepared to say that it extends its protection to a wife and child, inhabitants of another state for whose citizens the General Assembly of Louisiana has no authority to legislate.” Supra, at pages 334, 335. 8 (1916), 164 Wis. 223, 226 , 159 N. W. 726 . 9 See e.g., State v. Tickle (1953), 238 N. C. 206 , 77 S. E. 2d 632 , certiorari denied (1954), 346 U. S. 938 , 74 Sup. Ct. 378, 98 L.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bardahl Oil Co. v. Atomic Oil Co. of Oklahoma, Inc.
To acquire a secondary meaning, descriptive words must “have been used so long and so exclusively by one producer with reference to his” goods or articles “that, in that trade and to that branch of the purchasing public, the word or phrase [has] come to mean that the article” is “his product.” 2 In Spang v. Watson, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 266 , 205 F.2d 703 , c. d. 346 U.S. 938 , 74 S-Ct. 378, 98 L.Ed. 426 , the court said: “ * * * the application of this doctrine of secondary meaning requires that not merely ‘a subordinate meaning’ but ‘the primary significance of the term in the …
cited
Cited "see"
Everett A. R. Searl, Pearl A. Searl v. Donald M. Earll
See Wiren v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 1953, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 347 , 206 F.2d 465 , certiorari denied, 1954, 346 U.S. 938 , 74 S.Ct. 378 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Marriage of Stich
(2×)
When, as here, a valid marriage is admitted and the issue is the validity of a foreign divorce decree, it appears that the trial court has a larger measure of discretion to grant the application than when the fact of the marriage itself is in issue.” *72 (Id., at p. 127; see also Dietrich v. Dietrich (1953) 41 Cal.2d 497, 504 [ 261 P.2d 269 ], cert. den. (1954) 346 U.S. 938 [ 98 L.Ed. 426 , 74 S.Ct. 378 ].) However, even if the Mexican divorce is ultimately found to be valid, Emma could be awarded attorney fees necessary to allow her to pursue an action for support and division of community …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wiren
v.
Paramount Pictures, Inc.
v.
Paramount Pictures, Inc.
No. 491.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1954.
Benjamin F. Pollack, James M. Landis and George J. Solomon for petitioner. William E. Leahy, Wm. J. Hughes, Jr. and Louis Phillips for respondent.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.