green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lochhead v. Alacano
See Amen v. Black, 234 F.2d 12, 23-24 (10th Cir.) (under Kansas law, proportionate stockholders’ interests had to be maintained during sale of stock), cert, granted, 352 U.S. 888 , 77 S.Ct. 127 , 1 L.Ed.2d 84 (1956), cause remanded as moot, 355 U.S. 600 , 78 S.Ct. 530 , 2 L.Ed.2d 523 (1958) (per curiam); Crouse-Hinds Co. v. Intemorth, Inc., 518 F.Supp. at 402 (right to “exercise ... relative voice in corporate affairs” preserved under federal and New York state law); Jones v. Ahmanson & Co., 81 Cal. Rptr. at 599 , 460 P.2d at 471 (use of power by majority shareholders “must benefit all…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Black
v.
Amen
v.
Amen
No. 346.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 5, 1956.
Dean Acheson, Stanley L. Temko, Scott W. Lucas and Malcolm Miller for petitioners. Douglas F. Smith for Amen et al., Oliver H. Hughes for Sherrard et al., and D. Arthur Walker for Walker et al., respondents.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to question 1 presented by the petition for the writ which reads as follows:
“1. A question presented is whether a number of persons asserting separate and distinct demands as to which there were some common questions of law and fact, may intervene in a proceeding in a federal court, regardless of the citizenship of each intervener or other jurisdictional requirements, as the Court of Appeals held they might do, merely because the original plaintiff in this so-called spurious class action possessed the requisite jurisdictional requirements, including diversity of citizenship.”Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.