green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Kovrak v. Ginsburg
There was no support in fact for it and none tendered. 13 The judgment of the district court will be affirmed. 1 This case is a sequel to Ginsburg v. Kovrak, 1957, 11 Pa.Dist. & Co.R.2d 615, affirmed per curiam 392 Pa. 143 , 139 A.2d 889 , appeal dismissed 1958, 358 U.S. 52 , 79 s.Ct. 95, 3 L.Ed.2d 46 .
examined
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
(4×)
See New Orleans Park Improvement Assn. v. Detiege, 358 U.S. 54 , affirming 252 F.2d 122 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nick C. Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corporation, Theatre & Cinema, Inc., Philhamboro, Inc., Youngstown Theatre Corporation and Modern Playhouses, Inc.
(2×)
See Ginsburg v. Kovrak, 392 Pa. 143 , 139 A.2d 889 , appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 358 U.S. 52 , 79 S.Ct. 95 , 3 L.Ed.2d 46 (1958). 21 More important, the rules of the federal courts concerning admission of attorneys have long recognized that experts in federal law should be permitted, when appropriate, to conduct litigation in the federal courts regardless of whether they have been admitted to practice in the state in which the court sits.
cited
Cited "see"
Wright v. Georgia
See New Orleans Park Improvement Assn. v. Detiege, 358 U. S. 54 , affirming 252 F. 2d 122 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. Commonwealth
See, e.g., NAACP, Inc. v. Comm. on Offenses Against the Admin. of Justice, 199 Va. 665 , 101 S.E.2d 631 , vacated on other grounds, 358 U.S. 40 , 79 S.Ct. 24 , 3 L.Ed.2d 46 (1958) (discussing a trial court’s denial of a motion to quash subpoenas duces tecum after they were issued).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mohammad v. Slattery
Charles Gordon & Stanley Mailman, Immigration Law and Procedure, § 81.09[1] at 81-141 (Rev.Ed. 1993); see also In re Cartellone, 148 F.Supp. 676, 679 (D.C.Ohio 1957) (“Administrative Procedure Act authorizes a review by the court and inquiry as to fairness of hearing”), aff'd, 255 F.2d 101 (6th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 867 , 79 S.Ct. 99 , 3 L.Ed.2d 99 (1958).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Lige v. Town of Montclair
(6×)
See, e. g., New Orleans City Park Improvement Ass’n v. Detiege, 358 U. S. 54, 79 S. Ct. 99 , 3 L.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S ASSOCIATION Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(6×)
See, e.g., New Orleans City Park Improvement Ass'n v. Detiege, 1958, 358 U.S. 54 , 79 S.Ct. 99 , 3 L.Ed.2d 46 , aff'g 5 Cir. 1958, 252 F.2d 122 (segregated parks).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NEW ORLEANS CITY PARK IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION
v.
DETIEGE ET AL.
v.
DETIEGE ET AL.
295.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1958.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 27 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
Ed J. de Verges for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.