green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Montauk Oil Transportation Corp. v. Tug \El Zorro Grande\""
See Dunbar v. Henry Du Bois' Sons Co., 275 F.2d 304, 306 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 815 , 81 S.Ct. 45 , 5 L.Ed.2d 46 (1960). 13 The fines, penalties and recoveries provided for in section 1321 fall into two separate and distinct categories, the first dealing with the act of spillage and the second dealing with the cost of cleanup.
cited
Cited "see"
Montauk Oil Transportation Corp. v. Tug \El Zorro Grande\""
See Dunbar v. Henry Du Bois’ Sons Co., 275 F.2d 304, 306 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 815 , 81 S.Ct. 45 , 5 L.Ed.2d 46 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Stevens v. East-West Towing Company, Inc., Avondale Shipyards, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. East-West Towing Company, Inc. And Vanguard Insurance, Cross-Appellants
See Dunbar v. Henry DuBois' Sons Co., 275 F.2d 304 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 815 , 81 S.Ct. 45 , 5 L.Ed.2d 46 (1960) (shipowner may sue towage contractor under breach of warranty theory for indemnity in wrongful death action).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stevens v. East-West Towing Co.
See Dunbar v. Henry DuBois' Sons Co., 275 F.2d 304 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 815 , 81 S.Ct. 45 , 5 L.Ed.2d 46 (1960) (shipowner may sue towage contractor under breach of warranty theory for indemnity in wrongful death action).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Peplinski
See State v. Walker, 251 N.C. 465 , 112 S.E. 2d 61 , cert. denied 364 U.S. 832 , 5 L.Ed. 2d 58 , 81 S.Ct. 45 ; State v. Hooker, 145 N.C. 581 , 59 S.E. 866 .
cited
Cited "see"
Nicroli v. Den Norske Afrika-Og Australielinie Wilhelmsens Dampskibs-Aktieselskab
See Dunbar v. Henry Du Bois’ Sons Co., 275 F.2d 304, 306 (2d Cir. 1960), cert denied 364 U.S. 815 , 81 S.Ct. 45 , 5 L.Ed. 2d 46 . . “§ 407.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fisher
v.
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
v.
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
No. 112.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1960.
Owen Rail and Henry T. Synek for petitioner. James A. Velde for respondent.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.