green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1929 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1929
1977
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Andrew Greschner, Ronnie Joe Criswell
See Swallow v. United States, 307 F.2d 81 , 85 & n. 14 (10th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963). 6 The *381 Government was allowed to impeach all the defense witnesses, including Greschner, with their prior convictions.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Prince, Screenco, Inc., Climatrol Corporation and Emery Findley, Jr.
See Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115, 126-27 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyons Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Bridgeport Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 307 F.2d 580 (3rd Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Springfield Institution for Savings v. Worcester Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 329 Mass. 184 , 107 N.E.2d 315 (1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 884 , 73 S.Ct. 184 , 97 L.Ed. 684 ; North Arlington National Bank v. Kearny Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 187 F.2d 564 (3rd Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 816 , 72 S.Ct. 30 , 96 L.Ed. 617 ; United States v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 151 F.Supp. 690 (E.D.Wis.1957),…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael B. Bethany, No. 73-3085 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409
See Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115, 126 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Beitel v. United States, 306 F.2d 665, 672 (5th Cir. 1962). 6 Affirmed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bethany
See Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115, 126 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Beitel v. United States, 306 F.2d 665, 672 (5th Cir. 1962).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee W. Merrick
See Swallow v. United States, 10 Cir., 307 F.2d 81, 82 , cert. denied 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 .
cited
Cited "see"
Archie L. Wainwright v. United States
See Swallow v. United States, 10 Cir., 307 F.2d 81 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Central Savings and Loan Association of Chariton, Iowa v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, Central Savings and Loan Association of Chariton, Iowa v. United Federal Savings and Loan Association of Des Moines, Iowa, First Federal Savings and Loan Association, Carroll, Iowa v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
See Bridgeport Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 307 F.2d 580 (3rd Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Rowe, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 140 , 284 F.2d 274 (1960); First National Bank of McKeesport v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association, supra. 18 In requesting authority from the Board to serve eleven Iowa communities United Federal asserted service could feasibly be furnished to as few as five or six communities.
discussed
Cited "see"
Central Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
See Bridgeport Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 307 F.2d 580 (3rd Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Rowe, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 140 , 284 F.2d 274 (1960); First National Bank of McKeesport v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association, supra. In requesting authority from the Board to serve eleven Iowa communities United Federal asserted service could feasibly be furnished to as few as five or six communities.
discussed
Cited "see"
Abraham Robert Ayash, Also Known as Robert Crail v. United States
See Swallow v. United States, 10 Cir., 307 F.2d 81 , cert. denied 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 , rehearing denied 372 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 718 , 9 L.Ed.2d 731 ; United States v. Bernard, 7 Cir., 287 F.2d 715 , cert. denied 366 U.S. 961 , 81 S.Ct. 1921 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1253 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mid-Atlantic Accessories Trade Ass'n v. Maryland
See, e. g., United States v. Ragland, 306 F.2d 732 (4th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 949 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Israel v. United States, 63 F.2d 345 (3d Cir. 1933); Millet, Pit and Seed Co. v. United States, 436 F.Supp. 84 (E.D.Tenn.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gee
See also Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963).” The motion filed on behalf of the defendant asserts jurisdiction both under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and under Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nichols v. State
Compare United States v. Ragland, 306 F. 2d 732 (4th Cir., 1962), cert. denied 83 S. Ct. 504 , in which the Court, noting that the Government relied on circumstantial evidence, said, “[Wjhich *350 type of evidence is, of course, sufficient to support the verdict, although it does not exclude every reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence,” citing Holland v. United States, 348 U. S. 121 , 139 and Moore v. United States, 271 F. 2d 564, 568 (4th Cir., 1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bridgeport Federal Savings & Loan Assn.
v.
Federal Home Loan Bank Board
v.
Federal Home Loan Bank Board
No. 556.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1963.
William B. Koch for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle and Alan S. Rosenthal for the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, and Henry W. Sawyer III and Raymond K. Denworth for Quaker City Federal Savings & Loan Assn., respondents.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.