How cited: Bridgeport Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board · Go Syfert

Bridgeport Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board (1963)

green · 96 citation events across 32 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1929 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
192919772026
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Swallow v. United States, 307 F.2d 81 , 85 & n. 14 (10th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963). 6 The *381 Government was allowed to impeach all the defense witnesses, including Greschner, with their prior convictions.
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115, 126-27 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115, 126 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Beitel v. United States, 306 F.2d 665, 672 (5th Cir. 1962). 6 Affirmed.
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115, 126 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Beitel v. United States, 306 F.2d 665, 672 (5th Cir. 1962).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Swallow v. United States, 10 Cir., 307 F.2d 81, 82 , cert. denied 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 .
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Swallow v. United States, 10 Cir., 307 F.2d 81 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 .
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Bridgeport Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 307 F.2d 580 (3rd Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Rowe, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 140 , 284 F.2d 274 (1960); First National Bank of McKeesport v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association, supra. 18 In requesting authority from the Board to serve eleven Iowa communities United Federal asserted service could feasibly be fur…
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Bridgeport Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 307 F.2d 580 (3rd Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Rowe, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 140 , 284 F.2d 274 (1960); First National Bank of McKeesport v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association, supra. In requesting authority from the Board to serve eleven Iowa communities United Federal asserted service could feasibly be furnis…
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Swallow v. United States, 10 Cir., 307 F.2d 81 , cert. denied 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 , rehearing denied 372 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 718 , 9 L.Ed.2d 731 ; United States v. Bernard, 7 Cir., 287 F.2d 715 , cert. denied 366 U.S. 961 , 81 S.Ct. 1921 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1253 .
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Bridgeport Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 307 F.2d 580 (3rd Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Springfield Institution for Savings v. Worcester Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 329 Mass. 184 , 107 N.E.2d 315 (1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 884 , 73 S.Ct. 184 , 97 L.Ed. 684 ; North Arlington National Bank v. Kearny Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 187 F.2d 564 (3rd Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 816 , …
Cited (see also) · D. Maryland · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., United States v. Ragland, 306 F.2d 732 (4th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 949 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963); Israel v. United States, 63 F.2d 345 (3d Cir. 1933); Millet, Pit and Seed Co. v. United States, 436 F.Supp. 84 (E.D.Tenn.1977).
green United States v. Gee (1972)
Cited (see also) · S.D. Tex. · signal: see also
See also Lott v. United States, 309 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 504 , 9 L.Ed.2d 498 (1963).” The motion filed on behalf of the defendant asserts jurisdiction both under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and under Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P.
green Nichols v. State (1968)
Cited (see also) · Md. Ct. Spec. App. · signal: compare
Compare United States v. Ragland, 306 F. 2d 732 (4th Cir., 1962), cert. denied 83 S. Ct. 504 , in which the Court, noting that the Government relied on circumstantial evidence, said, “[Wjhich *350 type of evidence is, of course, sufficient to support the verdict, although it does not exclude every reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence,” citing Holland v. United States, 348 U. S. 121 , 139 and Moore v. United States, 271 F. 2d 564, 568 (4th Cir., 1959).