green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2004 ·
…he privilege extends essentially only to the substance of matters communicated to an attorney in professional confidence.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
in Re George Green and Garlan Green
But see Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 , 637 even questions that related to whether (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 something occurred or not, would L.Ed.2d 499 (1963). go to the essence of the advice © 2015 Thomson Reuters.
discussed
Cited "but see"
in Re George Green and Garlan Green
But see Colton v. United States, communications generated prior to the time suit was filed 306 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. and Huie began personally compensating Ringer, it 951, 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963). appears that the court never reached the issue of when The attorney-client privilege embodied in Rule 503 Huie anticipated litigation.
cited
Cited "but see"
Huie v. DeShazo
But see Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
examined
Cited "but see"
In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of Glen J. Schroeder, Jr
there can, of course, be no question that the giving of tax advice and the preparation of tax returns ... are basically matters sufficiently within the professional competence of an attorney to make them prima facie subject to the attorney-client privilege.
cited
Cited "but see"
Masters v. Arend
But see Colton v. United States, 306 F. 2d 633, 635-636 (2d Cir., 1962), petition for cert. denied 83 S.Ct. 505 (1962).
cited
Cited "but see"
De Masters v. Arend
But see Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 635-636 (2d Cir., 1982), petition for cert. denied 83 S.Ct. 505 (1962).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Newman v. State
(2×)
he privilege extends essentially only to the substance of matters communicated to an attorney in professional confidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pub. Citizen, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.
See Colton v. U.S. , 306 F.2d 633 , 636-38 (2d Cir. 1962) (allowing inquiry into the nature of the attorney-client relationship if limited to "general responses, such as litigation, drafting of documents, tax advice, and the like"), cert. denied , 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 636 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Bailey v. Meister Brau, Inc., 55 F.R.D. 211, 214-15 (N.D.Ill.1972); 8 Wright, Miller & Marcus, op. cit., p. 138.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Hill
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Kelley, 77 F.R.D. 378 (D.D.C.1977); United States v. Premises and Real Property at 297 Hawley St., Rochester, N.Y., 727 F.Supp. 90 (W.D.N.Y.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Sessions v. Hill
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Kelley, 77 F.R.D. 378 (D.D.C.1977); United States v. Premises and Real Property at 297 Hawley St., Rochester, N.Y., 727 F.Supp. 90 (W.D.N.Y.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Modell
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 636 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 , 101 S.Ct. 677, 682 , 66 L.Ed.2d 584 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kletzkin v. Borough of Spotswood Bd. of Educ.
(2×)
See Zimmerman v. Board of Educ., 38 N.J. 65, 71 , 183 A.2d 25 (1962) (“The objectives [of the tenure statute] are to protect competent and qualified teachers in the security of their positions during good behavior, and to protect them, after they have undergone an adequate probationary period, against removal for unfounded, flimsy, or political reasons.”), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 956 , 83 S.Ct. 508 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Methodist Home v. Marshall
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 639-40 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Jordan v. Fourth Court of Appeals, 701 S.W.2d 644, 648 (Tex.1985) (orig. proceeding).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lopez
United States v. Garsson, 291 F. 646, 649 (S.D.N.Y.1923); see Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 , 487 n. 12 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
First Chicago Int’l v. United Exchange Co. Ltd., 125 F.R.D. 55, 56 (S.D.N.Y.1989); see Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Cuno, Inc. v. Pall Corp., 121 F.R.D. 198, 200 (E.D.N.Y.1988); see also United States v. Bein, 728 F.2d 107, 112 (2d Cir.1984) (similar formulation of factors); 8 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pereira v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (In re Al Nagelberg & Co.)
United States v. International Business Machines Corporation, 66 F.R.D. 206, 210 (S.D.N.Y.1974); United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 89 F.Supp. 357, 360 (D.Mass.1950); see Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 639 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
White v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc.
See, Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1962) cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); LaRouche Campaign v. F.B.I., 106 F.R.D. 500 (D.Mass.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Malone Freight Lines, Inc.
See Colton v. United States , 306 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Cheyenne Airport Board v. Rogers
See Batten v. United States, 306 F.2d 580 (10th Cir.1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 506 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963), and Annot., 22 A.L.R.4th 863 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon John Doe, Esq. Richard Roe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
(2×)
The privilege first arose as an exception to the testimonial compulsion for every man's evidence and is today a common law privilege recognized under Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 107 Although aware that defense counsel's presence at the grand jury to testify as to client identity and fee information is not within this privilege, In re Shargel, 742 F.2d 61, 62 (2d Cir.1984); see Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637-38 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); United States v. Pape, 144 F.2d 778, 782 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 752…
discussed
Cited "see"
Keese v. United States
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478, 491-92 (5th Cir.1962), (discussing the public interest protected by and the liberal construction of Rule 55(e)), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 639 (C.A. 2, 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Haymes v. Smith, 73 F.R.D. 572, 577 (W.D.N.Y.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Schenectady Savings Bank
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 640 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Loften
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
(2×)
See Colton v. United States, 2 Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 633, 639-40 , cert. denied, 1963, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America and Edmond J. Martin, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Craig E. Davis, United States of America and Edmond Martin, Special Agent, Plaintiffs v. Stephen M. Orr
(2×)
See Colton v. United States, 2 Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 633, 639-40 , cert. denied, 1963, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marianna Giampaoli v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Cohen v. Uniroyal, Inc.
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
(2×)
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 636 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Bailey v. Meister Brau, Inc., 55 F.R.D. 211, 214-15 (N.D.Ill.1972); 8 Wright & Miller, op. cit., p. 138.
discussed
Cited "see"
Haymes v. Smith
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. den., 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew’s, 13 F.R.D. 438 (S.D.N.Y.1952); Buckley v. Vidal, 50 F.R.D. 271 (S.D.N.Y.1970); New York C.P.L.R. § 4503.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Appearance of Alvin S. Michaelson, Esquire
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637-638 (2nd Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); C.
cited
Cited "see"
Garfinkle v. Arcata National Corp.
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Crossman v. United States
See United States v. Miller, 303 F.2d 703 (9 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 507 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Hamilton v. United States, 343 F.Supp. 426 (N.D.Cal.1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Association of New Jersey State College Faculties, Inc. v. Dungan
See Zimmerman v. Board of Education of Newark, 38 N. J. 65 (1963), cert. denied, 371 U. S. 956 , 83 S. Ct. 508 , 9 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Center on Corporate Responsibility, Inc. v. Shultz
See, Campbell v. Eastland, 5 Cir., 307 F.2d 478, 491-492 (1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Schmidt
(3×)
United States v. Brown, N.D.Ill.1972, 349 F.Supp. 420, 429 ; accord, Colton v. United States, 2 Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 633, 639 , cert. denied, 1963, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Schmidt
(3×)
United States v. Brown, N.D.Ill.1972, 349 F.Supp. 420, 429 ; accord, Colton v. United States, 2 Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 633, 639 , cert. denied, 1963, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America and Martin Hoffenblum, Special Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. George Cromer
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637-638 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963); C.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brown
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2nd Cir. 1962) cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America and Howard W. George, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Donald E. Cote
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 639 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963), which specifically withholds disclosure of memoranda and worksheets to the extent they contain confidential data not already published on the tax return.
cited
Cited "see"
Detroit Screwmatic Co. v. United States
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478, 488 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); Unistrut Corp. v. United States, 37 F.R.D. 478 (E.D.Mich.1965).
cited
Cited "see"
James D. Harris v. United States
See, for example, Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natta v. Hogan
See Colton v. United States, 2 Cir., 306 F.2d 633 , cert. denied 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 , an income tax prosecution where the lawyers made a blanket refusal to produce anything with relation to the income tax returns of the client. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Leve v. General Motors Corp.
See generally, Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 ; United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 89 F.Supp. 357 (D.Mass.1950); cf. Garrison v. General Motors Corp., 213 F.Supp. 515 (S.D.Calif.1963); Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Co., 18 F.R.D. 463 (S.D.N.Y.1956); McCormick, EVIDENCE (1954) p. 203.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andimo Pappadio
(2×)
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. American Optical Co.
See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 639 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perry v. McGuire
See Campbell v. Eastland, 307 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 502 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 (1963); United States v. Maine Lobstermen’s Ass’n, 22 F.R.D. 199 (D.Me.1958); United States v. Linen Supply Institute, 18 F.R.D. 452 (S.D.N.Y. 1955); Paul Harrigan & Sons v. Enterprise Animal Oil Co., 14 F.R.D. 333 (E.D.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mary A. Wald, United States of America v. H. L. Felter, United States of America v. R. J. Weber
See Batten v. United States, 10 Cir., 306 F.2d 580, 581, 583 , certiorari denied 371 U.S. 955 , 83 S.Ct. 506 , 9 L.Ed.2d 502 . 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aeronautical Communications Equipment, Inc.
v.
Pierce
v.
Pierce
No. 558.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1963.
Walter H. Free for petitioner., David Riñes, Robert H. Riñes and Walter Humkey for respondent.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Cited by 191 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (2) · Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.