Hansell v. Douglass, 375 U.S. 396 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Hansell v. Douglass, 375 U.S. 396 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fatemi v. Fatemi (pa, 1988-02-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Fatemi v. Fatemi (2×)
Pa. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Estate of Belemecich, 411 Pa. 506 , 192 A.2d 740 (1963), reversed on other grounds, Consul General of Yugoslavia at Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania, 375 U.S. 395 , 84 S.Ct. 452 , 11 L.Ed.2d 411 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Littlefield v. City Of Afton
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Such interference with constitutional rights is impermissible Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593, 597 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 2697 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); see Bynum v. Schiro, 219 F.Supp. 204, 210 (E.D.La.1963), (NAACP's license to use City auditorium unconstitutionally conditioned on comments compatible with segregation), aff'd, 375 U.S. 395 , 84 S.Ct. 452 , 11 L.Ed.2d 412 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Littlefield v. City of Afton
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593, 597 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 2697 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); see Bynum v. Schiro, 219 F.Supp. 204, 210 (E.D.La.1963), (NAACP’s license to use City auditorium unconstitutionally conditioned on comments compatible with segregation), aff’d, 375 U.S. 395 , 84 S.Ct. 452 , 11 L.Ed.2d 412 (1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lawrence University Bicentennial Commission v. City of Appleton
E.D. Wis. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bynum v. Schiro, 219 F.Supp. 204, 210 (E.D.La.1963), affirmed per curiam 375 U.S. 395 , 84 S.Ct. 452 , 11 L.Ed.2d 412 (1964): “A municipality cannot deny the use of a public building to one organization while ‘permission is freely granted to others * * applying, [for the use of the building] * * * for the purpose of public assembly and discussion.’ ”; United States Servicemen's Fund v. Shands, 440 F.2d 44, 46 (4th Cir. 1971): “It is much too late in the history of the First Amendment to seriously suggest that public officials managing a public facility may pick and choose th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HANSELL Et Al.
v.
DOUGLASS Et Al.
586.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 6, 1964.
375 U.S. 396
Ervin W. Potter for appellants., Howard A. Rankin for appellees.
Per Curiam.
Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.