Am. Exp. Lines, Inc. v. Provenza, 376 U.S. 952 (1964). · Go Syfert
Am. Exp. Lines, Inc. v. Provenza, 376 U.S. 952 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Frank L. Hook (ca6, 1986-03-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Frank L. Hook (2×)
6th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sica v. United States, 325 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 952 , 84 S.Ct. 970 , 11 L.Ed.2d 972 (1964) 9 Since Hook has accepted the district court's post-verdict determination concerning the running of the limitations period and his argument that the convictions are time-barred fails even if we also accept, for purposes of this appeal, that the limitations period begins to run on these crimes when the elements first appear, we express no opinion concerning the Government's notion that evasion of taxes by non-payment and concealment of assets constitutes a continuing of…
cited Cited "see" Bridges Scott v. The Ss Ciudad De Ibague, Her Engines, Tackle, Furniture and Apparel, and Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A.
5th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Provenza v. American Export Lines, 4 Cir. 1963, 324 F.2d 660, 663 , cert. denied, 376 U.S. 952 , 84 S.Ct. 970 , 11 L.Ed.2d 971 . 9 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Henry Brown v. Richard L. Dugger, as Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida (2×)
11th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Sica v. United States, 325 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 952 , 84 S.Ct. 970 , 11 L.Ed.2d 972 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Export Lines, Inc.
v.
Provenza
No. 814.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1964.
376 U.S. 952
William A. Grimes and Richard W. Case for petitioners. John J. O’Connor, Jr. for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.