green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
McCrary v. Jetter
See Herschel v. Dyra, 365 F.2d 17, 20 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 973 , 87 S.Ct. 513 , 17 L.Ed.2d 436 (1966) (the retention of records after dismissal does not violate accused’s constitutional “right of privacy”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tennessee Products & Chemical Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Basham Coal Company
(2×)
See International Union UAW v. NLRB, 124 U.S. App.D.C. 215, 363 F.2d 702 , 706-707 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 973 , 87 S.Ct. 510 , 17 L.Ed.2d 436 (1967). 134 Similarly, while the Poplar Coal Company contract with the Southern Labor Union was signed considerably more than 6 months before the unfair labor practice complaint, Poplar's (i.e.
cited
Cited "see"
Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General Sessions
See Herschel v. Dyra, 7 Cir., 365 F.2d 17 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 973 , 87 S.Ct. 513 , 17 L.Ed.2d 436 (1966); Kolb v. O’Connor, 14 Ill.App.2d 81 , 142 N.E.2d 818 (1957). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Co., 271 F.2d 109, 118-19 (3d Cir.1959); Pittsburgh Steamship Co. v. NLRB, 180 F.2d 731, 735 (6th Cir.1950); see also International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. NLRB, 363 F.2d 702 , 707 (D.C.Cir.) (rejecting argument NLRB used section 8(c) protected statements as “as some evidence of the unfair labor practices themselves” and concluding statements were used only to “place[ ] • • ■ other acts in context”), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 973 , 87 S.Ct. 510 , 17 L.Ed.2d 436 (1966). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leslie Anderson, United States of America v. James A. Anderson
(2×)
See also United States v. Thompson, 366 F.2d 167, 170-73 (6th Cir.), Cert. denied, 385 U.S. 973 , 87 S.Ct. 512 , 17 L.Ed.2d 436 (1966); Wagner v. United States, 263 F.2d 877, 880 (5th Cir. 1959); United States v. Weinberg, 226 F.2d 161, 165-67 (3d Cir. 1955), Cert. denied, 350 U.S. 933 , 76 S.Ct. 305 , 100 L.Ed. 815 (1956). 18 In addition to the effect of the defendants' activities on the highway program, the use of CETA employees for the sole benefit of James A. Anderson on his fencing "subcontract" thwarted the intended purpose of the CETA program, which is to provide additional funding for …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward Heilman v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Thompson, 366 F.2d 167 (6th Cir. 1966), certiorari denied, 385 U.S. 973 , 87 S.Ct. 512 , 17 L.Ed.2d 436 .
Aero Corp.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 662.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1966.
John E. Branch and James P. Swann for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.