green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.6 score
“if the tort claims act is to have the corpuscular vitality to cover anything more than automobile accidents in which government officials are driving, the federal courts must reject an absolutist interpretation____”
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bradley v. United States
if the tort claims act is to have the corpuscular vitality to cover anything more than automobile accidents in which government officials are driving, the federal courts must reject an absolutist interpretation____
discussed
Cited "see"
Goldston v. State
(2×)
White v. Hill, 125 N.C. 194 , 200, 34 S.E. 432, 433 (1899) (citing Garner v. Worth, 122 N.C. 250, 252 , 29 S.E. 364, 365 (1898)) (decided under former article XIV, section 3); accord State v. Davis, 270 N.C. 1, 14 , 153 S.E.2d 749, 758 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 828 , 88 S.Ct. 87 , 19 L.Ed.2d 84 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Crenshaw v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
TPI International Airways, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration (In Re TPI International Airways, Inc.)
See Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1985
See generally Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967); Note, The Discretionary Function Exception: Is it a Bar to Federal Jurisdiction?, 1983 Utah L.Rev. 117 (1983); Note, Federal Tort Claims Act: The Development and Application of the Discretionary Function Exemption, 13 Cum.L.Rev. 535 (1982/1983) In recognition of the problems that surround the application of the discretionary function exception, and in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Varig, we believe that the proper approach to determining when the ex…
discussed
Cited "see"
Begay v. United States
See generally Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967); Note, The Discretionary Function Exception: Is it a Bar to Federal Jurisdiction?, 1983 Utah L.Rev. 117 (1983); Note, Federal Tort Claims Act: The Development and Application of the Discretionary Function Exemption, 13 Cum.
cited
Cited "see"
Aronson v. United States
See Smith v. U.S., 375 F.2d 243, 246-47 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Heywood v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 245-48 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Floyd A. Wright v. United States of America, and Nathan Fletcher, Malcolm S. Segal and Does I Through Xxiii
See Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin Bell
See Payton v. United States, 679 F.2d 475, 479 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (en banc) (“If strictly followed, [the] ... language [of the FTCA] would exempt ... all but the most fortuitous events, for ‘[ujnless government officials (at no matter what echelon) make their choices by flipping coins, their acts involve discretion in making decisions.’ ”) (quoting Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967)).
cited
Cited "see"
Leona Bergmann v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ralph W. Staton v. United States
See Downs v. United States, supra, at 997 (citing Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967)); Griffin v. United States, 500 F.2d 1059, 1064 (3d Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
ca3 1978
See Marshall v. Ove Skou Rederi A/S, 378 F.2d 193 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 828 , 88 S.Ct. 86 , 19 L.Ed.2d 84 (1967); Schuylkill Transportation Co. v. Banks, 152 F.2d 405 (3d Cir. 1945).
cited
Cited "see"
PPG Industries, Inc. v. Ashland Oil Co.-Thomas Petroleum Transit Division
See Marshall v. Ove Skou Rederi A/S, 378 F.2d 193 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 828 , 88 S.Ct. 86 , 19 L.Ed.2d 84 (1967); Schuylkill Transportation Co. v. Banks, 152 F.2d 405 (3d Cir. 1945).
cited
Cited "see"
Holland v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243,248 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). 11.
cited
Cited "see"
Downs v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Downs v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1973
See Marshall v. Ove Skou Rederi A/S, 378 F.2d 193 , 197-198 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 828 , 88 S.Ct. 86 , 19 L.Ed.2d 84 (1967); Mills v. Mitsubishi Shipping Co., 358 F.2d 609, 612-613 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1036 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 , 18 L.Ed.2d 600 (1967); Walker v. Harris, 335 F.2d 185, 191 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 397 U.S. 930 , 85 S.Ct. 326 , 13 L.Ed.2d 342 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. S/S Dorothe Olendorff
See Marshall v. Ove Skou Rederi A/S, 378 F.2d 193 , 197-198 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 828 , 88 S.Ct. 86 , 19 L.Ed.2d 84 (1967); Mills v. Mitsubishi Shipping Co., 358 F.2d 609, 612-613 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1036 , 87 S.Ct. 1474 ,. 18 L.Ed.2d 600 (1967); Walker v. Harris, 335 F.2d 185, 191 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 397 U.S. 930 , 85 S.Ct. 326 , 13 L.Ed.2d 342 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ochran v. United States
See, e.g., Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967). 4 The Court sympathizes with Ochran for the injuries she has sustained.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
B & F Trawlers, Inc. And International Bank, N.A. v. United States
Compare Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 247-48 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967) (decisions on when, where and how to prosecute are shielded by discretionary function).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael J. Sutton and John Wiley Mitchell v. United States
(2×)
Compare Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967) (decisions on when, where and against whom to prosecute are discretionary under § 2680(a)); Gray v. Bell, 712 F.2d 490, 505 (D.C.Cir.1983) (“Although the concepts of ‘discretion’ in official immunity law and under the FTCA are not of identical scope, they are similar and may have a common origin”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cole v. United States
Downs v. United States, 522 F.2d 990, 997 (6th Cir.1975); See also Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gail Collins v. United States
(2×)
See also Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoston v. Silbert
See also Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967) (“The discretion of the Attorney General in choosing whether to prosecute or not to prosecute, or to abandon a prosecution already started, is absolute.” Id. at 247 .) Additionally, prosecutors are immune from liability predicated on a decision not to institute a criminal proceeding.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clemente v. United States
See also Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (C.A. 5,1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967); Goodwill Industries of El Paso v. United States, 218 F.2d 270 (C.A. 5, 1954); Cf. Gercey v. United States, supra (decided under the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 741 et seq., wherein it was held that in the absence of a specific Congressional mandate, there exists no duty upon the Coast Guard to establish a follow up system to prevent the use by the public of a vessel which the Coast Guard refused to certify, and which it knew was unsafe). 26 In juxtaposition Pla…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albert Roelofs, Jr. v. United States of America, the Travelers Insurance Company, Intervenor
Dalehite v. United States, 1952, 346 U.S. 15 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 ; see also, Smith v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 375 F.2d 243 , cert. den., 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 . 17 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bill R. Hunter, D/B/A the Courier
See, e. g., Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243, 247 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 841 , 88 S.Ct. 76 , 19 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bridges Scott v. The Ss Ciudad De Ibague, Her Engines, Tackle, Furniture and Apparel, and Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A.
See also Marshall v. Ove Skou Rederi A/S, 5 Cir. 1967, 378 F.2d 193 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 828 , 88 S.Ct. 86 , 19 L.Ed.2d 84 .
Williams
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
No. 294.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
Sup. Ct. Ill. Cer-tiorari denied.