green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin Sweig
See United States v. Rao, 394 F.2d 354, 356-357 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 845 , 89 S.Ct. 129 , 21 L.Ed.2d 116 , reh. denied, 393 U.S. 972 , 89 S.Ct. 390 , 21 L.Ed.2d 386 (1968); United States v. Jones, 374 F.2d 414, 419 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 835 , 88 S.Ct. 40 , 19 L.Ed.2d 95 (1967); United States v. Bergman, 354 F.2d 931, 934 (2d Cir. 1966); United States v. Marchisio, 344 F.2d 653, 667 (2d Cir. 1965). 1 In this case, there was sufficient evidence for the jury to infer that Sweig really remembered Roth, when he said he didn’t, and that he remembered making calls within th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuel Bronston
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Rao, 394 F.2d 354, 356-357 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 845 , 89 S.Ct. 129 , 21 L.Ed.2d 116 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony C. Thomas
See also United States v. Rao, 394 F.2d 354, 355 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 845 , 89 S.Ct. 129 , 21 L.Ed.2d 116 (1968). 2 In summary, I cannot agree that the jury was coerced by the Allen charge, or by the court’s other remarks, or by the combination of the two.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Owens
v.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
v.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
No. 320.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1968.
Otto B. Mullinax for petitioner., Luther Hudson for respondent.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.