green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2008 ·
…a state court's interpretation of its statute does not raise a federal question
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Boultinghouse v. Hall
a state court's interpretation of its statute does not raise a federal question
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
King v. White
a state court's interpretation of its statute does not raise a federal question
cited
Cited "see"
Yost v. Early
See Pearson v. Dodd, 410 F.2d 701, 707 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 465 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Jon T. Stephens and Susanne Stephens v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Norman v. Commissioner, 407 F.2d 1337, 1338 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 465 (1969); Foster v. Commissioner, 57 T.C.M.
cited
Cited "see"
Doe v. DiGenova
See Pearson v. Dodd, 410 F.2d 701, 704 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 465 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shapley v. Housewright
See Sturm v. California Adult Authority, 395 F.2d 446, 448-49 (9th Cir.1967) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 LEd.2d 466 (1969) (statutory provisions empowering state agency to determine sentences raise no federal question, for such matters are determined by the state).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spock v. United States
See Nader, 25 N.Y.2d at 574 , 307 N.Y.S.2d at 658 , 255 N.E.2d at 773 (Breitel, J., concurring opinion), quoting Pearson v. Dodd, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 279 , 283, 410 F.2d 701, 705 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 465 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin McNally v. The Pulitzer Publishing Company and Ted Gest
See Pearson v. Dodd, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 279 , 410 F.2d 701, 705-06 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 465 (1969). 14 This is not to say that conduct of newspaper publishers and reporters toward a suspected criminal may never constitute a violation of a constitutional right of privacy or tortious disclosure of private facts.
discussed
Cited "see"
John Doe v. John L. McMillan
(2×)
See Pearson v. Dodd, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 279 , 410 F.2d 701 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 465 (1969); Afro-American Publishing Co. v. Jaffe, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 70 , 366 F.2d 649 (1966) (en banc); Bernstein v. National Broadcasting Co., D.D.C., 129 F.Supp. 817 (1955), affirmed, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 112 , 232 F.2d 369 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 945 , 77 S.Ct. 267 , 1 L.Ed.2d 239 (1956) 14 The legal concept of privacy protects the individual not only against intrusions into his private affairs, but also against public disclosure of embarrassing private facts.
cited
Cited "see"
Francis T. Norman and Marguerite M. Norman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Francis T. Norman and Marguerite M. Norman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See 89 S.Ct. 2021 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Castillo v. Clark
See, e.g., Christian v. Rhode, 41 F.3d 461, 469 (9th Cir.1994); Cacoperdo v. Demosthenes, 37 F.3d *1120 504, 507 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1026 , 115 S.Ct. 1378 , 131 L.Ed.2d 232 (1995); Hendricks v. Zenon, 993 F.2d 664, 674 (9th Cir.1993); Miller v. Vasquez, 868 F.2d 1116, 1118-19 (9th Cir.1989); see also Sturm v. California Adult Authority, 395 F.2d 446, 448 (9th Cir.1967) (observing that “a state court’s interpretation of its [sentencing] statute does not raise a federal question”), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 466 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hubbard
See, e. g., Pearson v. Dodd, 410 F.2d 701, 704 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 465 (1969); Afro-Am.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United States
(2×)
Prosser, Supra, § 117 at 804, 1 F. Harper & F. James, Law of Torts, supra, at 682-83; See, e. g., Pearson v. Dodd, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 279 , 410 F.2d 701 , Cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 465 (1969) (recognizing tort of intrusion in general); LaCrone v. Ohio Bell Tel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas Charles Baughman v. United States
See, e. g„ Sturm v. California Adult Authority, 395 F.2d 446 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. den. 395 U.S. 947 , 89 S.Ct. 2021 , 23 L.Ed.2d 466 (1969); Petsche v. Clingan, 273 F.2d 688 (10th Cir. 1960); Story v. Rives, 68 App.D.C. 325 , 97 F.2d 182, 187 , cert. den. 305 U.S. 595 , 59 S.Ct. 71 , 83 L.Ed. 377 (1938).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Norman et ux.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 1352.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1969.
Charles J. McDonough for petitioners., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Joseph M. Howard, and John M. Brant for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.