Wilcox Mfg. Co. v. Jeffrey Galion Mfg. Co., 393 U.S. 1051 (1969). · Go Syfert
Wilcox Mfg. Co. v. Jeffrey Galion Mfg. Co., 393 U.S. 1051 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Arthur J. McGowan v. Gerald R. Scoggins Richard B. Kloskinski Harold v. Breiding James A. Etheridge, Jr. Ward R. Wilder and Bruce Johnson (ca9, 1989-11-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Arthur J. McGowan v. Gerald R. Scoggins Richard B. Kloskinski Harold v. Breiding James A. Etheridge, Jr. Ward R. Wilder and Bruce Johnson (2×)
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Lee, 400 F.2d 558, 562 (9th Cir.1968) ("the status of the deceased or injured person controls"), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969). 22 In 1971, the United States Supreme Court held that a violation of the Fourth Amendment "by a federal agent acting under color of his authority gives rise to a cause of action for damages consequent upon his unconstitutional conduct." Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
discussed Cited "see" Arthur J. McGowan v. Gerald R. Scoggins Richard B. Kloskinski Harold v. Breiding James A. Etheridge, Jr. Ward R. Wilder and Bruce Johnson (2×)
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Lee, 400 F.2d 558, 562 (9th Cir.1968) ("the status of the deceased or injured person controls"), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969). 22 In 1971, the United States Supreme Court held that a violation of the Fourth Amendment "by a federal agent acting under color of his authority gives rise to a cause of action for damages consequent upon his unconstitutional conduct." Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. United States
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
After viewing the facts of the case "in light of [this] underlying disciplinary rationale," id., the court allowed the FTCA claim to proceed, since "the civil litigation of negligence claims such as Johnson's could not possibly have any effect whatsoever on military discipline." Id. at 1439 ; see Lee v. United States, 261 F.Supp. 252, 256 (C.D.Cal.1966) (cited in Stanley, 639 F.2d at 1152 ), rev'd, 400 F.2d 558 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969); Downes v. United States, 249 F.Supp. 626, 628 (E.D.N.C.1965) (To determine whether a serviceman was i…
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. United States
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
After viewing the facts of the case “in light of [this] underlying disciplinary rationale,” id., the court allowed the FTCA claim to proceed, since "the civil litigation of negligence claims such as Johnson’s could not possibly have any effect whatsoever on military discipline.” Id. at 1439 ; see Lee v. United States, 261 F.Supp. 252, 256 (C.D.Cal.1966) (cited in Stanley, 639 F.2d at 1152 ), rev’d, 400 F.2d 558 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969); Downes v. United States, 249 F.Supp. 626, 628 (E.D.N.C.1965) (To determine whether a servic…
cited Cited "see" Alan E. Davis v. United States of America, Lt. Col. R. E. Stoffey
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lee, 400 F.2d 558, 562-63 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969).
cited Cited "see" James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. Army
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lee v. United States, 261 F.Supp. 252, 256 (C.D.Cal. 1966), rev’d 400 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation" (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
E.D.N.Y · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lee et al., 400 F.2d 558 (CA9 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969), wherein the court found that Congress has acquiesced in the holding of Feres [by] permitting the decision to remain undisturbed for eighteen years. * * * “[W]hen the questions are of statutory construction, not of constitutional import, Congress can rectify our mistake, if such it was, or change its policy at any time, and in these circumstances reversal is not readily to be made. 400 F.2d at 561 , quoting United States v. South Buffalo Railway Company et al., 333 U.S…
discussed Cited "see" Aleck Alexander, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-Appellant
8th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lee, 400 F.2d 558, 560-561 (CA9, 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969); Knight v. United States, 361 F.Supp. 708, 713 (W.D.Tenn.1972), aff’d, 480 F.2d 927 (CA6, 1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jacob Wallace Antoine, on His Own Behalf and Also on Behalf of His Relatives Similarly Situated v. United States
8th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. United States, 401 F.2d 785 (Ct.C1.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1055 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 696 (1969) (taking effected by inclusion of tribal land in national forests following erroneous surveys).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. United States
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lee v. United States, 400 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rotko v. Abrams
D. Conn. · 1971 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Lee, 400 F.2d 558 (9 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053 , 89 S.Ct. 691 , 21 L.Ed.2d 695 (1969); Sheppard v. United States, 369 F.2d 272 (3 Cir. 1966) (per curiam), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 982 , 87 S.Ct. 1286 , 18 L.Ed.2d 230 (1967); 2) An exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (j) proscribes any claim “arising out of the combatant activities of the military or naval forces, or the Coast Guard, during time of war.” This combatant activity exclusion has been interpreted to apply *48 to an undeclared war as well as a war which has been for…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilcox Manufacturing Co.
v.
Jeffrey Galion Manufacturing Co.
No. 786.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 1969.
393 U.S. 1051
John W. Malley and William T. Bullinger for petitioner., William H. Webb, John M. Webb, and David Young for respondent.
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.